945

Under a divorce… you can do whatever you want in your own house. No money from libs states.

946

Did PG just went poof?

947

That’s not what I asked you. Does the money follow those kids…yes or no?

948

I’m not even sure what you are asking at this point… I thought we were referring to a theoretical ideological divorce

949

Will YOU allow the money to follow the kids…simple yes or no answer.

950

Sure, I don’t mind a little socialism. You?

951

So you have no problem that your state takes away funds from public schools to give to parents so they can send their kids to a school of their choice?

952

No, I have no problem taking money from the rich wealth neighborhoods and transferring that money to poor kids who want a better school.

You?

953

Good…from here on out I want you to advocate against teachers union etc for schools of parents choice.

954

You would probably get a lot more sympathy for that argument if we didn’t see how, and what on, that money was spent.

I don’t want one dime of my tax money going to teach kids CRT or this gender nonsense and I wouldn’t vote for anyone that did.

955

And PG can come back and say I don’t want 1 dime being spent on religion/faith base either.

That is not how it works.

Edit to add…you’re paying for CRT now.

956

School choice is more than a bumper sticker. I would need to see the proposal. The devil is in the details.

Generally I have no problem taking money from rich neighborhoods and transferring to poor kids in poor neighborhoods with bad schools.

Conservatives do seem to have a problem with that.

If per pupil spending is $30k in a wealthy neighborhood but only 13k in a poor one… how do we reconcile the difference so that the poor kid could go to the rich neighborhood school?

957

It’s whatever the state is paying per child. Those funds follow the student schools of there parents choice. Doesn’t matter.

Local district taxation…you don’t have a say in that matter.

Are you still for that…yes or no?

1 Like
958

If a private school wants to teach CRT and Transgenderism, then the parents can spend their money to send them there. It’s putting that in Public Schools where there is no choice that I object to.

1 Like
959

If through taxes… I wouldn’t want that money spent at religious schools. Otherwise I don’t have an issue with taking from the rich neighborhoods. Rich people may have a problem with it… as do conservatives.

If you go with state avg… rich people are getting less money via voucher and poor people are getting more per voucher

960

Technically There is choice today.

961

Not for parents that pay taxes to support public schools and can’t afford to pay a second time for private.

Make the public schools neutral.

Allow the free market to determine what private schools teach. Those that want a more Christian education can get it. Those that want to teach kids that white people are inherently bad and that little boys may really be little girls, well, they can send their kids there with my blessing.

Everyone’s happy. However, we all know that won’t happen because what Democrats want are indoctrination centers.

962

And this will ultimately lead to making many, if not most, forms of contraception illegal.

963

We all have a free market example of education… secondary education through universities/colleges

Do we really want that model for k-12?

964

Still making demands.

Lets not forget this little tidbit.

But yet here you are…demanding spousal/child support.

1 Like