The lawyer did not mean what he said in his tweet

Camp · 2019-11-08T12:39:22.055Z

It just makes the D party appear more corrupt than the one they are accusing.

There is that. This is simple stuff, not Mission Implausible.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-08T12:43:26.026Z

Auto129:

Instead of putting their collective mind together to mount a defense against the heavy mist of legal jeopardy surrounding this administration, Rs are distracted by a cancel campaign against a lawyer who isn’t beholden to the whims of their mob in any way.

The 'heavy mist" is steam coming out of desperate Democrat ears. We’re laughing as the Ds tangled web of deceit unravels daily and more and more Americans are realising the extent of the swamp corruption Trump encountered when taking office and has been exposing ever since.

WuWei · 2019-11-08T12:43:53.957Z

Auto129:

Seems like it does.

Instead of putting their collective mind together to mount a defense against the heavy mist of legal jeopardy surrounding this administration, Rs are distracted by a cancel campaign against a lawyer who isn’t beholden to the whims of their mob in any way.

He could have ten thousand posts of coupe stuff, and that still doesn’t make any of the sworn testimony coming out of this inquiry untrue.

He is now part of the legal process.

Zander · 2019-11-08T12:46:11.859Z

Paul_Thomson:

Auto129:

Instead of putting their collective mind together to mount a defense against the heavy mist of legal jeopardy surrounding this administration, Rs are distracted by a cancel campaign against a lawyer who isn’t beholden to the whims of their mob in any way.

The 'heavy mist" is steam coming out of desperate Democrat ears. We’re laughing as the Ds tangled web of deceit unravels daily and more and more Americans are realising the extent of the swamp corruption Trump encountered when taking office and has been exposing ever since.

What data do you have to show that more and more Americans are realizing the extent of corruption that trump encountered?

Zander · 2019-11-08T12:46:47.951Z

WuWei:

Auto129:

Seems like it does.

Instead of putting their collective mind together to mount a defense against the heavy mist of legal jeopardy surrounding this administration, Rs are distracted by a cancel campaign against a lawyer who isn’t beholden to the whims of their mob in any way.

He could have ten thousand posts of coupe stuff, and that still doesn’t make any of the sworn testimony coming out of this inquiry untrue.

He is now part of the legal process.

So is the microphone the witnesses will speak into.

Phaedrus · 2019-11-08T14:02:03.033Z

Paul_Thomson:

I particularly liked this prediction, which he got completely backwards. -

" Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked,
“I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president.”

That should say,
" Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked, “I predict
@realDonaldTrump will play a key role in
@CNN
not finishing out his full term as president.”

“I predict @realDonaldTrump will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president.”

FTFY

gooddad409 · 2019-11-08T15:46:01.248Z

He will leave office…in jan of 2025.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-08T15:54:26.849Z

Make way for Kanye.

Probably not, but who knows?

I think Don Junior might be in the reserve chamber for 2020, should Don Senior be prevented from launching.

WuWei · 2019-11-08T16:01:16.282Z

So one of their own says “coup” and it’s Trump supporters believing in conspiracies. Predicted impeachment in 2017. When was the Ukraine call made?

Phaedrus · 2019-11-08T21:17:24.540Z

gooddad409:

He will leave office…in jan of 2025.

At this point, we can’t be sure he’ll leave willingly in Jan 2021 if he loses next year.

WuWei · 2019-11-09T23:05:42.513Z

Phaedrus:

gooddad409:

He will leave office…in jan of 2025.

At this point, we can’t be sure he’ll leave willingly in Jan 2021 if he loses next year.

Why not?

Weedhopper · 2019-11-10T00:02:58.268Z

To bad no one believes him but you.

He needs to testify on his coup attempt here.

DougBH · 2019-11-10T00:27:27.086Z

Zander:

WildRose:

That would be part of why it is called a “soft coup”.

Instead of being accomplished with violence it’s being accomplished by abusing the law and powers of congress.

Given this is heading to a trial in a legislative body majority-composed of Republican Senators duly elected to their seats by Republican voters across the country, let me first laugh my face off, and second just call this the most flaccid coup ever.

If the purpose then is not to get rid of Trump, what do you think the purpose of an impeachment would be?

WildRose · 2019-11-10T04:01:57.545Z

To harm his presidency as much as possible because without it they know he’ll probably win reelection.

They know that as it sits now there’s zero chance of his being removed by the senate.

There’s also a scenario by which they could make Pelosi President by impeaching both Trump and Pence.

Zander · 2019-11-10T04:20:55.633Z

DougBH:

Zander:

WildRose:

That would be part of why it is called a “soft coup”.

Instead of being accomplished with violence it’s being accomplished by abusing the law and powers of congress.

Given this is heading to a trial in a legislative body majority-composed of Republican Senators duly elected to their seats by Republican voters across the country, let me first laugh my face off, and second just call this the most flaccid coup ever.

If the purpose then is not to get rid of Trump, what do you think the purpose of an impeachment would be?

To impeach

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-10T04:27:14.425Z

WildRose:

To harm his presidency as much as possible because without it they know he’ll probably win reelection.

But impeachments without removal give the encumbent a boost. So I think they intend to blackmail or threaten Senators to turn against Trump. Not directly, but maybe CIA/FBI blackhats letting senators know some of the dirt they have on them (some may be being entrapped as we speak), a few Seth Rich styled failed robberies that become murders by the Dem wet-workers from South America.
And Anifa protests outside the homes of Senators’ families to make them feel unsafe.

WildRose · 2019-11-10T04:40:29.103Z

It can but it may not, the latter is what they are counting on.

They know they don’t have a case for conviction so there’s no other reason to go forward with impeachment.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-10T04:49:55.505Z

WildRose:

They know they don’t have a case for conviction so there’s no other reason to go forward with impeachment.

Unless they believe they can generate the media perception that a large number of GOP Senators want rid of Trump, and a media narrative that Trump deserves to go, and the fake polling that most Americans want him gone, as cover for enough senators to bow to illegally applied pressure to vote impeachment and removal.
There is no bottom below which Sieve and co won’t go, and they can’t afford full disclosure of their past behaviour.

zonulet · 2019-11-10T09:05:53.427Z

JayJay:

Has anyone here found out what the whistleblower’s Uber driver tweeted two years ago?

Because dammit it’s really an important piece of evidence!

I’d like to see his high school yearbook.

Axxowiz · 2019-11-10T09:52:12.889Z

I don’t think the senate will see it that way, and we certainly haven’t heard the end of it.