The lawyer did not mean what he said in his tweet

westaussie · 2019-11-08T09:44:31.782Z

There appears to be a paucity of details to inform posters what this thread is supposed to be about. Does anyone know what it is about?

westaussie · 2019-11-08T09:48:49.117Z

Which provision or provisions of the USA constitution is being violated in this impeachment inquiry?

westaussie · 2019-11-08T09:51:09.750Z

Only surpassed by Trump acolytes’ denials of any poor behaviour by Trump.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-08T10:18:59.109Z

I particularly liked this prediction, which he got completely backwards. -

" Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked,
“I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president.”

That should say,
" Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked, “I predict
@realDonaldTrump will play a key role in
@CNN
not finishing out his full term as president.”

biggestal99 · 2019-11-08T11:43:06.955Z

WuWei:

What is it?

Coups are unconstitutional, whereas impeachmeant is constitutional.

Allan

thinkingman · 2019-11-08T11:54:00.955Z

Paul_Thomson:

I particularly liked this prediction, which he got completely backwards. -

" Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked,
“I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president.”

That should say,
" Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked, “I predict
@realDonaldTrump will play a key role in
@CNN
not finishing out his full term as president.”

oh that’s right i forgot how he implicated cnn in his coup plans

i know apple, banana…

Camp · 2019-11-08T12:04:20.643Z

This does not help the D cause.

Auto129 · 2019-11-08T12:31:47.573Z

Seems like it does.

Instead of putting their collective mind together to mount a defense against the heavy mist of legal jeopardy surrounding this administration, Rs are distracted by a cancel campaign against a lawyer who isn’t beholden to the whims of their mob in any way.

He could have ten thousand posts of coupe stuff, and that still doesn’t make any of the sworn testimony coming out of this inquiry untrue.

Camp · 2019-11-08T12:39:22.055Z

It just makes the D party appear more corrupt than the one they are accusing.

There is that. This is simple stuff, not Mission Implausible.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-08T12:43:26.026Z

Auto129:

Instead of putting their collective mind together to mount a defense against the heavy mist of legal jeopardy surrounding this administration, Rs are distracted by a cancel campaign against a lawyer who isn’t beholden to the whims of their mob in any way.

The 'heavy mist" is steam coming out of desperate Democrat ears. We’re laughing as the Ds tangled web of deceit unravels daily and more and more Americans are realising the extent of the swamp corruption Trump encountered when taking office and has been exposing ever since.

WuWei · 2019-11-08T12:43:53.957Z

Auto129:

Seems like it does.

Instead of putting their collective mind together to mount a defense against the heavy mist of legal jeopardy surrounding this administration, Rs are distracted by a cancel campaign against a lawyer who isn’t beholden to the whims of their mob in any way.

He could have ten thousand posts of coupe stuff, and that still doesn’t make any of the sworn testimony coming out of this inquiry untrue.

He is now part of the legal process.

Zander · 2019-11-08T12:46:11.859Z

Paul_Thomson:

Auto129:

Instead of putting their collective mind together to mount a defense against the heavy mist of legal jeopardy surrounding this administration, Rs are distracted by a cancel campaign against a lawyer who isn’t beholden to the whims of their mob in any way.

The 'heavy mist" is steam coming out of desperate Democrat ears. We’re laughing as the Ds tangled web of deceit unravels daily and more and more Americans are realising the extent of the swamp corruption Trump encountered when taking office and has been exposing ever since.

What data do you have to show that more and more Americans are realizing the extent of corruption that trump encountered?

Zander · 2019-11-08T12:46:47.951Z

WuWei:

Auto129:

Seems like it does.

Instead of putting their collective mind together to mount a defense against the heavy mist of legal jeopardy surrounding this administration, Rs are distracted by a cancel campaign against a lawyer who isn’t beholden to the whims of their mob in any way.

He could have ten thousand posts of coupe stuff, and that still doesn’t make any of the sworn testimony coming out of this inquiry untrue.

He is now part of the legal process.

So is the microphone the witnesses will speak into.

Phaedrus · 2019-11-08T14:02:03.033Z

Paul_Thomson:

I particularly liked this prediction, which he got completely backwards. -

" Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked,
“I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president.”

That should say,
" Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked, “I predict
@realDonaldTrump will play a key role in
@CNN
not finishing out his full term as president.”

“I predict @realDonaldTrump will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president.”

FTFY

gooddad409 · 2019-11-08T15:46:01.248Z

He will leave office…in jan of 2025.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-08T15:54:26.849Z

Make way for Kanye.

Probably not, but who knows?

I think Don Junior might be in the reserve chamber for 2020, should Don Senior be prevented from launching.

WuWei · 2019-11-08T16:01:16.282Z

So one of their own says “coup” and it’s Trump supporters believing in conspiracies. Predicted impeachment in 2017. When was the Ukraine call made?

Phaedrus · 2019-11-08T21:17:24.540Z

gooddad409:

He will leave office…in jan of 2025.

At this point, we can’t be sure he’ll leave willingly in Jan 2021 if he loses next year.

WuWei · 2019-11-09T23:05:42.513Z

Phaedrus:

gooddad409:

He will leave office…in jan of 2025.

At this point, we can’t be sure he’ll leave willingly in Jan 2021 if he loses next year.

Why not?

Weedhopper · 2019-11-10T00:02:58.268Z

To bad no one believes him but you.

He needs to testify on his coup attempt here.