Samm
21
I probably read it when you were in diapers. 
3 Likes
Sounds like you need a refresher.
Samm
23
Sounds like you ought to read a dictionary.
1 Like
The dictionary doesn’t know what “human infrastructure” is doublespeak for either… and I’m starting think neither do you.
Samm
25
And either you don’t know that “human infrastructure” is a euphemism, i.e. doublespeak, for “social programs” aka “social welfare” or you are deliberately perpetuating the scam.
3 Likes
Finally, an answer.
I can see how terms are similar, though human infrastructure isn’t necessarily provided by the state, it can be private.
I disagree with your opinion that its a euphemism as that would imply its trying to hide what it is, which its not.
Samm
27
The answer was there all along. I was testing you. You failed.
1 Like
How much private “human infrastructure” is the “infrastructure bill” funding? And how much of the “human infrastructure” in the "infrastructure bill is “government social welfare”?
2 Likes
Dunno
And how much of the “human infrastructure” in the "infrastructure bill is “government social welfare”?
Considering its a government bill, I would assume most if not all.
DougBH
32
Yes. 1984 is book infrastructure because I want to use it that way.
Um, which ones of us is having a stroke?
[quote=“fallenturtle, post:30, topic:240559, full:true”]
So, in terms of actual Democrat practice, human infrastructure is social welfare, hence double speak.
2 Likes
Is “infrastructure” doublespeak for public works projects, then?
DougBH
36
Not if they include structures. Hence “infrastructure”.
Infrastructure isn’t limited to physical structures.
DougBH
38
Infrastructure isn’t whatever you want to call infrastructure because you think it is more sellable than what it is.
3 Likes
Samm
39
All good here. If anyone is, it must be you.