I was just thinking to myself how intelligent you’d have to be to post pictures of crying Clinton supporters and consider that effective debating.
no, it’s actual trolling. you aren’t making any points. posting pictures of Hillary supporters on election night is just ■■■■■■■ stupidity.
Cratic3947:You’d have to link me, and was Strzok the Trump hating dem hack leading the investigation at that time
I didn’t ask what you made your hats out of…But, I’m not surprised…
I was just thinking to myself how intelligent you’d have to be to post pictures of crying Clinton supporters and consider that effective debating.
I’m just a simple man… deplorable, uneducated, old, and white. You can’t expect much.
What is your highest level of educational attainment?
Call_me_Ishmael: FlyAway: Call_me_Ishmael: CaughtInTheMiddle: Call_me_Ishmael: CaughtInTheMiddle: NuffSaid:It’s a new wave of jobs “Dot connectors”.
All you need is conspiracy theorists and dots and the ability to upload to YouTube. No police or FBI needed.
i’m convinced that it’s just in certain people’s DNA to be suckered.
The moment they realized that they were suckered:
https://squawker.org/wp-content/uploads/WbmQUixg-1021x580.jpg
okay. i gotta bookmark this post. Mueller hasn’t reported yet.
He’s probably in one of those pictures.
serious question. do you wake up in the morning and say “I can’t wait to troll on the hannity board all day today” and then before you go to bed, pat yourself on the back and say “boy, I trolled the ■■■■ out of the hannity board today and can’t wait for tomorrow”?
It’s all debate. When my debate technique completely destroys your debate points and has you spinning in circles, you call it trolling.
no, it’s actual trolling. you aren’t making any points. posting pictures of Hillary supporters on election night is just ■■■■■■■ stupidity.
It puts your arrogance and certainty in the context of reality. You lie to yourselves and then cry when you discover that you’ve been lied to.
What is your highest level of educational attainment?
My mom gave me a gold star.
First and foremost, you’re untruthful.
Which is a good characteristic for a troll to have.
First and foremost, you’re untruthful.
Which is a good characteristic for a troll to have.
So my mom DIDN’T give me a gold star? I thought I graduated.
dantes:First and foremost, you’re untruthful.
Which is a good characteristic for a troll to have.
So my mom DIDN’T give me a gold star? I thought I graduated.
Well, you’ve been here 89 days and average 49.8 troll posts PER DAY. I’m sure your mom is very proud.
Shoo.
/tenchars
Yeah… the word is prolific.
Shoo.
/tenchars
Hasn’t your hive leader told you to stop responding to me? You should obey.
I just don’t see the point. There’s nothing to learn from you.
Yeah… the word is prolific.
it IS a word that starts with “p” and ends in “ic” but it’s not prolific.
ohknow35:If you’ve got some sort of proof, now would be the time to show it.
If you’re satisfied that the same intelligence community who let it happen and continue to let trump remain president then who am I to stop you believing. Good thing obama was on the case.
It’s not up to the American intelligence community to force conservatives to have consciences and working brains.
Obama tried to go to Mitch McConnell to forge a bipartisan front against the Russian meddling. What he received was basically a giant middle finger. We all know what would have transpired if President Obama unilaterally announced that Russia was attempting to influence the election in favor of Trump. The Conservative Entertainment Complex, Trump sycophants in Congress, and tens of millions of low information Republicans around the country would have gone apoplectic accusing him of putting his finger on the scale in favor of Hillary.
barack hussein obama - “no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections.”
So no proof. That’s what I thought.
Thanks.
No, you don’t want to listen. Why don’t you ask McConnell why he didn’t want to do anything about it?
I just don’t see the point. There’s nothing to learn from you.
You refuse to learn. I’ve explained tremendous amount about such a wide range of topics… from vetting, to advanced surveillance techniques, security classification and security procedures, CO2 in the atmosphere and global screaming… er… warming, good muslims, bad muslims, CDC analysis of HIV and homosex, federal acquisition processes… just to name a few topics off the top of my head.
Call_me_Ishmael:Yeah… the word is prolific.
it IS a word that starts with “p” and ends in “ic” but it’s not prolific.
Vanna? Vanna White? Is that you?
I’ve read all those ramblings. Your posts are much less informative than you think.
For instance, your discussions about CO2 levels usually devolve to “I explained it before but I’m not going to do it again so just trust me and don’t worry about not providing any actual information.”
It’s a recurrent pattern for you.
Regardless, the vast vast majority of your posts now are trolling and conspiracy theories.
I’ve read all those ramblings. Your posts are much less informative than you think.
For instance, your discussions about CO2 levels usually devolve to “I explained it before but I’m not going to do it again so just trust me and don’t worry about not providing any actual information.”
It’s a recurrent pattern for you.
Regardless, the vast vast majority of your posts now are trolling and conspiracy theories.
Sorry… explaining things 5 times to adults who have minds like children is not a good use of my own time.