i wouldnt put it in quite those terms

but what i believe doesnt matter

1 Like

Hmmm…ok.

I’d say there’s a decent chance that someone on this forum donated, given the years of admiration for Trump and commitment to the stolen election lie here. Maybe a poster could share how they think about this.

3 Likes

They would donate again in a heartbeat.

Is your question really that hard to answer, one way or the other? LOL

Id guess there are a number here who are still donating. You too can 'Save America"!

1 Like

Poster on another board started a campaign to support the ill-fated ā€œWe Build the Wallā€ scam on another website I frequent.

He’s no longer there for some reason.

2 Likes

Barr, Jason Miller, Mark Meadows, etc.: There was no fraud and we told Trump that.

Trump: I need donations from rubes to fight fraud!

MAGA: Yay! Here it is: I want to flush my money down a gold toilet!

2 Likes

It’s hard to blame people like Oz for wanting in on this lucrative and target-rich environment.

American history is filled with carnival barkers selling snake oil in some form or another and I hand it to Trump that he has been one of the best- a true master of the craft. He figured out that the American presidency could be the greatest grift of all.

On your birthday Mr. Trump…bravo!

2 Likes

You should check to see if Biden’s ā€œThought Policeā€ is hiring.

3 Likes

[quote=ā€œmargaretms2, post:6987, topic:239662, full:trueā€]

It’s become the standard:

Talking about fraud in the third person:

  • Everone knows there was massive fraud
  • Clearly massive fraud
  • Overwhelming proof of massive fraud

Talking about fraud in the first person

  • maybe, possibly, potential for fraud
  • just asking for an audit
  • Result doesn’t make sense
  • Rules were changed

Nobody claiming large scale fraud on this forum has withstood more than a half dozen posts on the details.

They just drop in with innuendo or a partisan message and then change the topic or back away.

Because the position that the evidence proves fraud is indefensible at this point.

2 Likes

There is absolutely nothing we would like more than for the Democrats to attempt a prosecution. Unlike the Kangaroo Courts in the House, in an actual court room we can subpoena witnesses, cross examine, and present evidence.
So please…PLEASE… Bring charges.

1 Like

Honestly that is going to likely be up to the Peach State first. I seriously doubt the DOJ would go there but who knows?

And yes actually - indicting and convicting Trump would be bad- very bad for Dems. What we really want is to see this…

I guess you haven’t watched 2,000 Mules. I understand the Democrat Party has forbidden it’s followers to do that.

1 Like

Trump’s Attorney General Barr called the film, which has also been panned by experts, as ā€œunimpressiveā€ and "indefensible."

1 Like

You really need to stop believing your own propaganda.

But you haven’t watched it, right?

I don’t think anyone is prohibited from seeing the movie.

Would you like to debate the claims made by the movie?

I don’t watch flat earth ā€œdocumentariesā€ either.

1 Like