2155

As I said, use that as an excuse for setting up a kangaroo court for political purposes. Just admit what it is.
Not fooling anyone.

3 Likes
2157

Nonsense. There is no reason a person can’t be both. The real reason is that Pelosi didn’t want anyone to upset the narrative. Proof of that is removing Banks.

2 Likes
2158

How is appointing a potential witness and someone that could potentially be involved not political?

2159

It’s a conflict of interest

2160

No the reason is Republicans gave her the option to
be selective and not seat members that were out there to he disruptive. Republicans could of had equal footing if they wanted it

2161

No it isn’t. First of all, he hasn’t been called as a witness…and it would be nonsense to do so. Did he trespass? Second, if pre established positions make one not eligible, then the committee would be vacant.

2 Likes
2162

No need to not tell the truth.
There was never going to be a bipartisan independent committee.
The leftist have played this game to many times for anyone to believe them. They say one thing and when the GOP jump on board they say sorry we changed our minds and since we are in charge we will make up any rules we want.
For once they wised up and voted against being told to sit in the back of the bus.

2163

No it wouldn’t. He spoke twice to the President on January 6th That is relevant

2164

Not in the House committee. Again, if you want to use that as an excuse for setting up a kangaroo committee in the House, do so. At least admit that is what it is.
Say…we gave them a chance to agree with setting up a fairer committee that they didn’t want so we get to have this mockery of a committee.

2 Likes
2165

So much for a fair impartial commission. Right in your post your prove that the GOP was right in voting against the leftist partisan clown show. The GOP was never going to have a say in anything. Nancy makes the rules and the GOP were just going to be told shut up and get in the back of the bus,

1 Like
2166

Seeing that the metadata of his communications on January 6th is being requested it appears his potential for a conflict of interest is just a tad bit higher than other members

2167

Than nancy should step aside as she had her own role in what happened on Jan 6.

2 Likes
2168

In the paranoid fantasy world where Trump ordered the trespass and that congressman was in on it. In an AOC world.

1 Like
2169

Nancy isn’t on the committee…Jordan is still a member of Congress

2170

No need to not tell the truth. The GOP were never going to have equal footing. That lie has been told by the leftist too many times for anyone to believe.

1 Like
2171

Conflict of interest? Every congressperson has a political interest in this show trial. Conflict of interest is not relevant here.

2172

Nice gaslighting. Nobody is claiming he ordered it. Its the part where he did very little to stop it once it started

Are you saying that Jordan didn’t talk to the President at least twice on January 6th?

2173

How does that square against the fantasy that Pelosi planned for Jan. 6th to happen?

2174

Nancy is in charge of the capital police along with McConnell. The capital police messed up. She should be called to testify and her communications need to be looked at to see who she talked to and what she knew before the riot started.

2 Likes
2175

I’m saying that talking to the President is not relevant, unless being anti Trump is also,relevant. What, you want to pretend that isn’t a biased panel? Please.
In any case, that should be for the Republicans to decide in selecting their people. Imagine the outrage if at the Kavanaugh hearings the Republicans had removed Democrats whom they thought wouldn’t be fair.

Remember, if Republicans take over either house, Democrats are establishing a precedent here. Shades of Harry Reid.

2 Likes