So I guess this means that illegals can now hold office in state and local jurisdictions. Who will be the first illegal governor or state representative?
I agree 100%. It’s a big country and people have ample choice as to where they want to live. I’ve moved for lesser reasons. But I’m pretty sure that any localities that do allow illegal voting have a fairly large population of illegals living there. In which case those that don’t like it probably wouldn’t live there to begin with.
In the case of the SF school district that Crenshaw mentions, the citizens of that school district voted to allow non-citizens (they must also have children attending the district schools) to vote in the school districts elections. Are you opposed to the citizens of school district setting their own standards for voting in the districts elections?
Which state or local laws state they can run for office?
Can you guys stick to what’s actually happening as opposed to immediately sliding down the slippery slope of imagine the worst case scenario?
The citizens of those localities voted to allow non-citizens to vote in local elections. If I lived there, I might vote differently, but I don’t live there.
So who am I to tell them they’re wrong? They voted for it.
That’s what separation of powers is all about, you see…
I’m sure if residents in those municipalities disagree, they can bring it to the courts.