I would just like to be in the room when someone explains to Trump** that during even a civil suit discovery, depositions and testimony under oath go both ways.
It would be wonderful to see the subpoena’s that DNC lawyers will request through the Judge and then to see Trump** testifying under oath.
.
.
.
.
Reality is I don’t think it will get that far. This is a PR stunt and another avenue to grift the suckers.
No it’s not true. The Mueller report definitely shows a “link” between Russia and the campaign.
What the report does not show is conspiracy or coordination between the two.
In any event, I think the suit doesn’t go anywhere, but Trump does run the risk of reopening the whole affair in the public’s mind. Does he really want to encourage people to look beyond Barr’s white wash?
I’m not here to try and convince you otherwise, I’m just glad the Clintons are losing money for their government-funded lies. I’ll be back for the celebrations.
@SixFoot If you think Trump is owed damages because of a “media frenzy” .Then you must think Obama was owed damages from Trump for saying his birth certificate wasn’t real…correct?
This will go exactly nowhere. As with Trump’s clumsy Biden-Ukraine TV mafia-move, where the point was merely to announce the investigation, the point here is the announcement.
“Under the guise of ‘opposition research,’ ‘data analytics,’ and other political stratagems, the Defendants nefariously sought to sway the public’s trust,” says the lawsuit, filed in federal court in Florida. “They worked together with a single, self-serving purpose: to vilify Donald J. Trump.”