It is very difficult to ignore the new information being exposed about Trump. More and more reports present a damning indictment of corrupt Trump motives. Of course, if the evidence supports misdeeds whether major or minor, abuse of power should not be whitewashed.
In this sense it is troubling that anyone would object to calling witnesses.
Then again in all prosecuted cases the evidence is overwhelming if only the prosecution presents evidence.
There is no sense of context in snippet reports. Sound bite evidence may be hearsay or may be accurate but seldom are the edits objective.
The prosecution and the defense look at the same coin and on sees heads and the other sees tails.
Perhaps a Jedi manipulation of the force flipping the coin exists.
This is the question, one side says perfect. the other is convinced nobody has ever been so corrupt.
The prosecution has claimed irrefutable evidence for 3 years.
what if it is the prosecution that is corrupt.