So no penalties for poor performance. Got it.

Intended by who? Regardless of intentions, they are long-term jobs for many people.

So what, we have to deal with reality as it is not as it was intended.

But the primary reason for that was that ever other first world’s infrastructure was devastated by WWII and ours was not.

And with no job they ALL qualify for free healthcare (medicade/medicare/disability). Lets ALL go on that system.

All depends on where they live. Utah hasn’t raised the min above the fed rate. Here where I live in Rural Utah even Mcdee’s and BK starts at 10 bucks an hour. That’s more than enough to live on here.

1 Like

How many of those minimum wage earners are supervisin multi million (sometimes billion) dollar budgets, supply lines and that, cost for goods, employment levels and all that other fun stuf?

2 Likes

Doesn’t matter. Nobody should be getting million dollar taxpayer funded bonuses

How much federal tax are they paying on that? How much earned income rebate are they getting? How much in food stamps? How much in child care payments? Are they in subsidized housing?

Gave me a laugh. lol

$10/hour on a full-time job is $1,600/month before taxes. Meanwhile:

The median monthly gross residential rent in Utah was $986 in 2017 according to the Census ACS survey.1 Average gross rent was $1,014 in 2017 .

Are you sure that’s “more than enough to live on”?

Okay, lets roll everything back to how it was in the 40’s/50’s. You know technology, social stuff, wages, taxes . . . . transportation . . . everything.

Okay then . . . what penalties for individual who continually need government support?

1 Like

Let’s pretend they pay $0 in taxes and pay half their money to rent, which is the median rate. Is $1,000/month enough for a person to live on in the US in 2020? Maybe, but I wouldn’t want to try it.

Here where I live, you can rent a 3 bed home for 500 a month. Apartments go for 400 a month.

What? ROFL! That is simply ridiculous. What does an improvement in technology have to taxes on the rich. If they were able to get by in a low tech world they should be able to do the same with better technology.

When will the ultra-rich catch a break in America?

That seems like an outlier. Where do you live?

You want higher taxes that “were not an issue back then” . . . then why not roll EVERYTHING back to what it was when the tax on the rich was extremely high? Why only one thing? They survived high taxes, everyone else survived everything else.

Rural Utah. Go up in the big city (salt lake/ogden/provo) and you pay a fortue. Go down to St. George you pay a fortuen. Most of rural utah is still extremely affordable. Remember, median means half the rent is lower than that, and half the rent is higher.

Because that suggestion is so beyond ridiculous its astounding. There is no reason the rich can’t prosper now with the same rates that they did back then