So no penalties for poor performance. Got it.
Oryx
103
Intended by who? Regardless of intentions, they are long-term jobs for many people.
So what, we have to deal with reality as it is not as it was intended.

WCD9973:
Here is a different idea.
System isnt broken.
I know -No one will agree with me. But its not. Our PRIORITIES are broken. But not the system.
Somehow - a large number of people agreed with Trickle down Economics so much, that it drove them to always vote the same way regardless of what facts and evidence have shown over the past 40 years.
The system did what it was designed to do - Change to reflect what a majority of voters wanted the society to look like. So the result was a widening wealth gap, lower and lower and lower taxes, a permanent wealth class, a permanent lower class, little movement between, etc…etc…
Its not the system that broke. Its us that broke.
If we decided the priorities are different, If we decide that we want a bigger safety nest for individuals, regulation that still rewards innovation and allows market to pick winners and losers, but a true progressive tax system that priorities a safety net for individuals and a trickle up economy, not a trickle down - We can fix it.
Again - Not socialism but also not MORE reduction in taxes. Capitalism was alive and well in the 50’s and 60’s despite MUCH higher taxes for rich individuals and corporations.
US style Capitalism has not failed. Our priorities and belief in Trickle down economics failed.
But the primary reason for that was that ever other first world’s infrastructure was devastated by WWII and ours was not.
Snow96
106
And with no job they ALL qualify for free healthcare (medicade/medicare/disability). Lets ALL go on that system.
Snow96
107
All depends on where they live. Utah hasn’t raised the min above the fed rate. Here where I live in Rural Utah even Mcdee’s and BK starts at 10 bucks an hour. That’s more than enough to live on here.
1 Like
Snow96
108
How many of those minimum wage earners are supervisin multi million (sometimes billion) dollar budgets, supply lines and that, cost for goods, employment levels and all that other fun stuf?
2 Likes

Snow96:
How many of those minimum wage earners are supervisin multi million (sometimes billion) dollar budgets, supply lines and that, cost for goods, employment levels and all that other fun stuf?
Doesn’t matter. Nobody should be getting million dollar taxpayer funded bonuses
Snow96
110

Oryx:
Two full-time jobs at $7/hour is about $2,000/month, before taxes. The median monthly rent in the US is about $1,000. I don’t see how anyone survives on that.
How much federal tax are they paying on that? How much earned income rebate are they getting? How much in food stamps? How much in child care payments? Are they in subsidized housing?
Oryx
112
$10/hour on a full-time job is $1,600/month before taxes. Meanwhile:
The median monthly gross residential rent in Utah was $986 in 2017 according to the Census ACS survey.1 Average gross rent was $1,014 in 2017 .
Are you sure that’s “more than enough to live on”?
Snow96
113
Okay, lets roll everything back to how it was in the 40’s/50’s. You know technology, social stuff, wages, taxes . . . . transportation . . . everything.
Snow96
114
Okay then . . . what penalties for individual who continually need government support?
1 Like
Oryx
115
Let’s pretend they pay $0 in taxes and pay half their money to rent, which is the median rate. Is $1,000/month enough for a person to live on in the US in 2020? Maybe, but I wouldn’t want to try it.
Snow96
116
Here where I live, you can rent a 3 bed home for 500 a month. Apartments go for 400 a month.

Snow96:
Okay, lets roll everything back to how it was in the 40’s/50’s. You know technology, social stuff, wages, taxes . . . . transportation . . . everything.
What? ROFL! That is simply ridiculous. What does an improvement in technology have to taxes on the rich. If they were able to get by in a low tech world they should be able to do the same with better technology.
When will the ultra-rich catch a break in America?
Oryx
118
That seems like an outlier. Where do you live?
Snow96
120
You want higher taxes that “were not an issue back then” . . . then why not roll EVERYTHING back to what it was when the tax on the rich was extremely high? Why only one thing? They survived high taxes, everyone else survived everything else.
Snow96
121
Rural Utah. Go up in the big city (salt lake/ogden/provo) and you pay a fortue. Go down to St. George you pay a fortuen. Most of rural utah is still extremely affordable. Remember, median means half the rent is lower than that, and half the rent is higher.
Because that suggestion is so beyond ridiculous its astounding. There is no reason the rich can’t prosper now with the same rates that they did back then