The constitutional right to privacy

BlueTex · 2019-05-22T10:16:57.144Z

Snow96:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers , and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,

Pretty clear.

You have the right as a person to be secure from invastion of privacy. You house as well, Papers and effects.

Is tax information your property?

Justia Law

United States v. Dickey, 268 U.S. 378 (1925)

United States v. Dickey

FreeAndClear · 2019-05-22T11:15:49.466Z

Pretty clear and yet as late as the 90s conservative litmus tests for judges were partially based on the absence of the right ik the constitution.

Smyrna · 2019-05-22T11:21:19.688Z

calirepub:

If the government wants to know everything I say or do there’s no reason for me to object. I’m not a criminal.

…but that behavior of the government is criminal.

FreeAndClear · 2019-05-22T12:19:05.799Z

Why is it criminal? How much privacy does a person “deserve” to be protected?

Smyrna · 2019-05-22T12:28:24.975Z

FreeAndClear:

Why is it criminal? How much privacy does a person “deserve” to be protected?

It’s an illegal search and no one, especially the government has that right. I can’t even believe we are discussing this? Do you really not understand the potential ramifications? Do you really not understand the power you’d be handing over to those whose desire is to increase their power and wealth and would be unchecked? Who governs the government? We do…and therefore…the government can NEVER be trusted with this much power over citizens.

Plasmaball · 2019-05-22T12:34:39.069Z

Amazing

Smyrna · 2019-05-22T12:43:48.054Z

Plasmaball:

Amazing

Sheople need a sheopherd…do you?

Plasmaball · 2019-05-22T12:45:19.662Z

Nope just reflecting your comment with comments over the years with certain topics…

Smyrna · 2019-05-22T12:46:47.208Z

Plasmaball:

Nope just reflecting your comment with comments over the years with certain topics…

Good. On this subject, “we” all need to be united.

Plasmaball · 2019-05-22T12:48:35.599Z

We arent…

Smyrna · 2019-05-22T12:49:56.473Z

Plasmaball:

We arent…

that’s baaaaaa, baaaaaaa, baaaaaad.

Plasmaball · 2019-05-22T12:52:34.417Z

Do you like watch content children programming or something and that’s why you speak to us like we are toddlers?

FreeAndClear · 2019-05-22T12:52:38.708Z

You didn’t answer my question. You just kind of yelled into the void. How Much privacy does a person deserve?

FreeAndClear · 2019-05-22T12:53:37.618Z

If she agrees to it how is it an illegal search. She chooses…

Snow96 · 2019-05-22T12:56:39.164Z

Snow96:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers , and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,

I just stated it to you:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers , and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,

FreeAndClear · 2019-05-22T12:57:27.865Z

That’s an emanation. Whatever happened to originalists? Where have all you gone?

Plasmaball · 2019-05-22T13:02:57.456Z

That’s not it…keep looking

Snow96 · 2019-05-22T13:03:00.731Z

Time for that presedant to be over turned.

Taxes are NOT voluntary. See what happens if you refuse to do your tax forms and turn them in. As such, they should fall under the right to be secure since the government demands the information or you go to jail.

BlueTex · 2019-05-22T13:39:50.898Z

Snow96:

Time for that presedant to be over turned.

Taxes are NOT voluntary. See what happens if you refuse to do your tax forms and turn them in. As such, they should fall under the right to be secure since the government demands the information or you go to jail.

What has changed that would justify overturning this case?

Smyrna · 2019-05-22T13:46:03.285Z

FreeAndClear:

You didn’t answer my question. You just kind of yelled into the void. How Much privacy does a person deserve?

Privacy isn’t a “deserve”, it’s a RIGHT under the Constitution.