they get paid more.

Allan

They were? How many of them died in wars?

1 Like

Or on the Titanic.

1 Like

My sisters loved house work as opposed to field work when we were kids. Oh, you had to vacuum? Pfft.

1 Like

That’s your justification for men treating them like their subordinates??? You go with that. I wonder what percent of today’s 20 something year old women would just love it if they could be taken back to the 1920s??

2 Likes

Funny thing is 1920s is kind of a bad example … because flapper girls.

1 Like

I am sure they are much happier today, earning money and doing most of the house work and child rearing. Weird that they originally didn’t want to vote, until they were assured that didn’t mean they would have to do things like fight wars and join the fire brigade. Obviously the women with abusive husbands were worse off, hard to say that about all the rest.

Yet more sadness

Forget aspiration. Forget freedom to choose to be successful. “Better off” if not abused.

2 Likes

Poor things, not free to work the fields, coal mines and other back breaking menial labor, because those were the vast majority of jobs.

Now they get to be doctors

Is that the bulk of them, no.

Does it have to be the bulk?

They get to be doctors now that’s pretty cool

Back then.

Not today.

So you see why returning to 1920s standards would be stupid.

This steaming plate of tripe brought to you today, courtesy of the “Slavery was actually good for the slaves” school of clowns.

3 Likes

The big question is: if they had twitter back then, could women post?

Hmmmmmmm. No. And we all know that’s the measure of true oppression.

1 Like

They weren’t slaves.

Who is Mary Shelley?

Definitely the bulk of women back then. For sure. Super example. Lol.

Choosing not to write and it being forbidden, not the same things.