Texas GOP Rep Files Suit to Find EC Counting Law Unconstitutional

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@biggestal99

@Call_me_Ishmael

The problem is irrelevant. The legal and peaceful means to address even a perceived problem is what libs seem to be offended by. And yet they took little offense here when perceived problems of racism are addressed with violence, looting, and burning

You can file lawsuits until the cows come home, it won’t change the election result of Biden getting 306 electoral votes and being inaugurated as the POTUS on January 20.

Allan

I’m sure the plaintiffs thank you for your permission.

[biggestal99]

@Call_me_Ishmael

I’m sure the plaintiffs thank you for your permission.

Not my permission to give. Anyone can file a lawsuit alleging crap.

The electoral count act of 1887 is in no way unconstitutional.

Allan

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@Call_me_Ishmael

and private conversation is impossible if they cannot meet face to face. Right? Isn’t that the narrative? I’ve heard that ridiculous explanation several times now.

It is impossible for them to have been overheard at the Supreme Court by an intern, since none of them have set foot in the building in months, aside from Justice Ginsberg’s memorial.

I know you really want to believe it.

[gooddad409]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@Oryx

@Call_me_Ishmael

This is not a steam of conscious thread is it?

I assume you mean “stream of consciousness,” and no, my comment was factual and on-topic.

Not the topic you and i were discussing. The number of times one chooses to utilize a peaceful and lawful means to address a perceived injustice has little to do with what that perceived injustice is.

Plus trump himself has only filed about 4 suits. Some folks need to watch something besides fake news once in a while.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@Call_me_Ishmael

and private conversation is impossible if they cannot meet face to face. Right? Isn’t that the narrative? I’ve heard that ridiculous explanation several times now.

It is impossible for them to have been overheard at the Supreme Court by an intern, since none of them have set foot in the building in months, aside from Justice Ginsberg’s memorial.

I know you really want to believe it.

So no interns are capable of using conferencing technology and are not present where and when a judge uses their internet conferencing capability.

You are wishing and speculating against all likelihood.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@Call_me_Ishmael

So no interns are capable of using conferencing technology and are not present where and when a judge uses their internet conferencing capability.

You are wishing and speculating against all likelihood.

No clerks or interns are present when the Justices meet for their conferences, even without COVID. During this COVID shutdown - just like the Justices, all the SCOTUS clerks are working remotely.

They conference on old-fashioned telephone lines, not “the internet”.

[enki]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@TheDoctorIsIn

@Call_me_Ishmael

and private conversation is impossible if they cannot meet face to face. Right? Isn’t that the narrative? I’ve heard that ridiculous explanation several times now.

It is impossible for them to have been overheard at the Supreme Court by an intern, since none of them have set foot in the building in months, aside from Justice Ginsberg’s memorial.

I know you really want to believe it.

So no interns are capable of using conferencing technology and are not present where and when a judge uses their internet conferencing capability.

You are wishing and speculating against all likelihood.

the claim in question was that the meeting was held in person. we’ve been through this before.

2020 Election Fraud Thread (Part 1)

Ummm… I yelled at my boss a few weeks ago… on Skype for Business. Are you aware of this technology? the claim is that they met in person, not over IP. Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS. Today was like nothing we have ever seen. The justices are arguing loudly behind closed doors. The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard. Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall. They met in person, because…

Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS. Today was like nothing we have ever seen. The justices are arguing loudly behind closed doors.

The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard.

Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall.

They met in person, because they didn’t trust telephonic meeting as secure.

Chief Justice Roberts was screaming

“Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?”

Howard Mortman

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@Call_me_Ishmael

So no interns are capable of using conferencing technology and are not present where and when a judge uses their internet conferencing capability.

You are wishing and speculating against all likelihood.

No clerks or interns are present when the Justices meet for their conferences, even without COVID. During this COVID shutdown - just like the Justices, all the SCOTUS clerks are working remotely.

They conference on old-fashioned telephone lines, not “the internet”.

You really don’t know.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

I assure you, I really do.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@TheDoctorIsIn

I assure you, I really do.

You may have your toe in the SCOTUS water but you can’t assure me of anything.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@Call_me_Ishmael

You may have your toe in the SCOTUS water but you can’t assure me of anything.

Of course not. I don’t expect you to accept the truth, you’re too invested.

But it is still quite entertaining to watch you bluster and pretend you know what you’re talking about.

[WuWei]

I don’ understand the play here. What are republicans trying to achieve?

Is it simple delegitimization?

It’s obvious Jbiden won.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@WuWei

I don’ understand the play here. What are republicans trying to achieve?

Honestly, in this particular case I won’t blame “the republicans”. This is all Gohmert, by himself.

He’s a true believer.

[WuWei]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@WuWei

I don’ understand the play here. What are republicans trying to achieve?

Honestly, in this particular case I won’t blame “the republicans”. This is all Gohmert, by himself.

He’s a true believer.

In what?

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@WuWei

In what?

In whatever he reads on the internet, apparently.

Keep in mind, he’s the one who was spreading the Army raided the secret server in Germany rumour.

[WuWei]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@WuWei

In what?

In whatever he reads on the internet, apparently.

Keep in mind, he’s the one who was spreading the Army raided the secret server in Germany rumour.

Well, that’s unfortunate. The House is supposed to be chaos, but I really don’t understand this.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

Don’t look at me, he’s from your state.

[WuWei]

@TheDoctorIsIn

Don’t look at me, he’s from your state.

He’s from East Texas, which explains a lot.

But it’s not just him.

He has to know this isn’t going anywhere.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@WuWei

@TheDoctorIsIn

Don’t look at me, he’s from your state.

He’s from East Texas, which explains a lot.

But it’s not just him.

He has to know this isn’t going anywhere.

It doesn’t have to.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@TheDoctorIsIn

But it is still quite entertaining to watch you bluster and pretend you know what you’re talking about.

the only thing I need to know is that the sound of people’s voices - whether energized by vocal cords or computer speakers - travel through walls, ceilings, and floors.