I told you. You didn’t understand. Asking again won’t help you understand better.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Samm
243
That has been the modus of the left for decades.
2 Likes
conan
245
It’s you that’s trying to change the subject about tax payers funding PP.
As for abortion…it’s none of my ■■■■■■■ business. But I do have strong opinion of those that kill unborn…specially late term.
So…are you going to support me in ending all funding for PP…yes or no?
Samm
246
You missed the point. The suit is not filed with an expectation of wining. The suit is filed to make it too troublesome and expensive to continue in business.
For that very reason, Congress gave gun manufactures limited liability protection from such lawsuits … protection that libs want Congress to revoke.
Are you going to respond to my response regarding your question with videos of abortions or are you just going to run away like the other Conservative Corner people are doing?
I mean come on, at least be the one that challenges the group think. Conservatives are supposed to be independent thinkers. Or, true Conservatives.
You know you have it right when people on both sides hate you and think you are on the other side.
It’s like I’m the grim reaper. I steal everyone’s soul.
I’m sure you think I like that though.
But whatever; I’m a leftist, right? I’m SUPPOSED to like that kind of thing. It’s in my job description you gave me.
Samm
251
If you are the only person in the Company who is on their left foot when the drill sergeant yells “hut!” you are still out of step. 
1 Like
No woman needs an abortion, even in cases of rape and incest. Social and financial support, yes, even therapy and mentoring, yes, but certainly not abortion. Abortion may may things worse- because in those cases, it is unexpected, and that would definitely cause a bad response mentally. Add in the fact it could be coerced by an abusive spouse or someone who has control over the person, and it is even worse. Not to mention the normal risks.
With threat to the woman’s life, I can see that, but I think that many OB/GYNs would be willing to do a C-section, or at least, rule out a C-section, before they would consider abortion.
1 Like
In JROTC, if I was behind a freshman in formation, and they were out of step, I would start kicking their heels to get them in step.
Kind of mean, but you do what you have to.
I will not respond to disrespectful questions. Not here. Not anywhere. Ask me respectfully. You know, like the way I communicate with you. What question do you have that I have not answered? Try again.
You never responded to me intially when I responded to your post. You never stated your point of asking me why there aren’t any videos of abortion and how I would react to one. It was an appeal to emotion and the manipulation was obvious.
I don’t take too kindly to someone who manipulates me and tries to passive-aggressively paint me as someone I’m not. The disrespect seemed to start with you, so, I will respond in kind. Thanks for playing.
I don’t manipulate people. EVER. We can do this with civility but we can’t unless you want to.
Do you want to?
I have my reply to your question ready if you are ready to cease with the insulting tone.
I’m sorry I jumped down your throat.
Go for it.
Okay here we go. I asked why we cannot access videos of abortion as we can any other medical procedures. I wanted you to think it through and come up with the correct answer. You chose not to do this. So here is the answer.
If people were exposed to chopped up baby parts, faces arms, legs, ears they would probably throw up at the sight and want abortion banned. Any actual human would get sick at the sight.
This is why abortion is not simply “a medical procedure” as the dems claim. They don’t want people to actually see the brutality of it. There is no need to cover up “medical procedures.”
1 Like
Guvnah
261
It’s not just the fact that it’s alive. That phrasing gives quarter to the deflectors who want to equate the embryo to a patch of skin or a gob of ejaculate.
The point is that it’s a unique organism. And (as you pointed out) a human organism. Therefore a separate and unique life unto itself.
Science (specifically biology, as you noted) has very clear criteria for identifying a living organism. (And none of the criteria has anything to do with a moral question. Deflectors who try to make it a moral question are ignoring the science.) As you noted earlier, this is covered in grade school and high school biology. The embryo unequivocally fits all the criteria. Deflectors who refuse to acknowledge this are ignoring the science And biology also unequivocally identifies the human embryo as human and only human.
Skin does not fit the criteria for a living organism. Nor a sperm cell or an egg cell.
Libs need to start believing the science.
1 Like
