"According to FEANTSA & Foundation Abbé Pierre estimations in their 4th Overview of Housing Exclusion in Europe, at least 700,000 homeless people are sleeping rough or in emergency/temporary accommodation on one night in the European Union. It is an increase of 70% compared to ten
years ago.

Over the last ten years, the number of homeless
people has increased at an alarming rate in almost
all European Union countries: broadly speaking, this
increase has led to the explosion in the number of
people needing emergency shelter."

Great ad … but she still only managed to garner 28% of the vote against the incumbent Democrat. Seems black voters in are afraid to save themselves.

1 Like

That doesn’t even make sense. If corporations provide the services, there is no need for taxes.

What the what now?

Didn’t you read what you posted?

Yeah.

Do you?

Do I what?

Nope. Not always. You shouldn’t make stupid categorical claims like that. If it always worked, you wouldn’t find lots of instances of people around the world who pushback against it.

I’ll go further than that. Most of Europe was laissez-faire in the 1800s, now none are because it panned out so poorly that people got rid of it. Laissez-faire failed the market test.

1 Like

That may very well be true. But let us not forget the relentless attacks on Kimberly by Baltimore’s Fifth Column media which works hand in hand with the Democrat Party Leadership to keep them in power and in control of the people.

JWK

Don’t get me wrong, I know how she was brutally attacked by the Democrat slave masters, but the fact remains, it appears that the typical black voter is afraid to go against them.

Oh, I agree with you on that, especially single, unwed black moms who are afraid to lose the “free” government cheese which keeps them enslaved…

JWK

2 Likes

I was responding to his stupid claim that it never works. Free markets are the ONLY system that have ever worked to improve the quality of life for the average person. As to the 1800’s, I think you might want to go back and study history a bit more. #1. They didn’t “get rid” of free market systems, they still exist and are the driving force behind every successful European economy. What you see is a transition to having done SO well that they have accepted more government involvement in trying to get rid of the remnants of poverty and it’s turned into a system where it’s profitable to be lazy.

Socialism is a failure and lightly regulated capitalism is a success. History proves me right. Why people still argue for the system that has allowed governments the power to murder or starve more than 100,000,000 people in the last 100 years is beyond me. It’s just idiotic.

1 Like

What do you mean by capitalism?

Did you miss THIS POST?

Real nice of you to confiscate wages that I earn without my consent and redistribute my money to people who didn’t earn it, destroying my economic freedom in the process.

1 Like

You mean like you guys transfer our wealth to the poor?

Recently Cal just goes in and throws away their stuff using the sanitation department, and won’t let them panhandle in super market lots anymore. Seems to be working.

Not at all. If they’re receiving food and board who do you think SHOULD pay for it?

How the hell do you think people pay their taxes if they don’t labor for it?

2 Likes

That was the intention of the Democrat Party Leadership working to get the 16th Amendment adopted.

It is now used, and unconstitutionally I might add, to lay and collect a direct un-apportioned tax on the property earned by the sweat of your labor, while it allows those who have money working for them to avoid contributing into the federal treasury by clever definitions of “taxable income”.

The Democrat Party Leadership even got Disney to produce a propaganda piece suggesting it was unpatriotic to avoid the “temporary” Victory Tax, which today, in effect, is still collected from your earned wages under an un-apportioned “direct tax” on the property you earn by the sweat of your labor!
.

Why on earth do working people vote for a party leadership which is intent on keeping them enslaved?
.

JWK

“The property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of the poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his own hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property.” ___ Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746 (1884)