Taylor Swift remains silent, avoids answering critical question about the candidate she has endorsed

[SeaManatee]

Because of the massive fraud you are allowed to terminate all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution in order to correct what happened. And the founding fathers would understand that.

Seems pretty straightforward.

[johnwk2]

Only to those with a reading comprehension problem, or intentionally attempting to attach meaning to words which are not there.

[SeaManatee]

You can’t even figure out a Taylor Swift endorsement message.

[johnwk2]

Your opinion is noted, and obviously absurd since you misrepresented Trump’s clearly stated message:

Trump wrote on Truth Social on December 3, 2022:

“So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections.”

There is nothing in those words calling for “the termination of our Constitution”.

[tnt]

@johnwk2

It’s a projected end result if our election process is subjugated, effectively resulting in the termination of our rules, including our constitution.

No…he says the fraud ALLOWS FOR the termination. Not that is RESULTS IN…

[johnwk2]

Your lack of reading comprehension skills is showing again.

The end results of allowing "MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION . . . effectively results in a subjugation of our rules, including a termination of our Constitution, our supreme rule of the land.

You still have not posted Trump’s alleged words calling for a termination of the Constitution.

[tnt]

@johnwk2

Your lack of reading comprehension skills is showing again.

The end results of allowing "MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION . . . effectively results in a subjugation of our rules, including a termination of our Constitution, our supreme rule of the land.

You still have not posted Trump’s alleged words calling for a termination of the Constitution.

@tnt

No…he says the fraud ALLOWS FOR the termination. Not that is RESULTS IN…

You’re just making stuff up at this point.

[johnwk2]

You continue to avoid posting Trump’s alleged words, calling for a termination of the Constitution.

[tnt]

@johnwk2

You continue to avoid posting Trump’s alleged words, calling for a termination of the Constitution.

I’ve posted them a half dozen times.

[gooddad409]

@johnwk2

You continue to avoid posting Trump’s alleged words, calling for a termination of the Constitution.

He can’t because they don’t exist.

[johnwk2]

@tnt

@johnwk2

You continue to avoid posting Trump’s alleged words, calling for a termination of the Constitution.

I’ve posted them a half dozen times.

No. You have not. You apparently made that up.

Trump, to the best of my knowledge, has never called for “. . . .the termination of the Constitution”.

If he has, post his words.

.

[tnt]

@johnwk2

No. You have not. You apparently made that up.

Trump, to the best of my knowledge, has never called for “. . . .the termination of the Constitution”.

If he has, post his words.

Last time.

A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.

I wonder what you will copy and paste next.

[johnwk2]

@tnt

@johnwk2

No. You have not. You apparently made that up.

Trump, to the best of my knowledge, has never called for “. . . .the termination of the Constitution”.

If he has, post his words.

Last time.

A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.

I wonder what you will copy and paste next.

Nothing in those words call for “. . . .the termination of the Constitution”.

So, in fact, you are making ■■■■ up. You never posted Trump’s words calling for ". . . .the termination of the Constitution”.

You are pulling the same crap as was the case when Trump spoke about “bloodbath”.

[tnt]

@johnwk2

Nothing in those words call for “. . . .the termination of the Constitution”.

So, in fact, you are making ■■■■ up. You never posted Trump’s words calling for ". . . .the termination of the Constitution”.

I’m sorry you lack basic reading comprehension.

[johnwk2]

You are the one projecting a false assertion concerning Trump’s words.

You are pulling the same crap as was the case when Trump spoke about “bloodbath”. You make up ■■■■ .

And now you have reached the point of trolling.

[LucyLou]

@tnt

@johnwk2

No. You have not. You apparently made that up.

Trump, to the best of my knowledge, has never called for “. . . .the termination of the Constitution”.

If he has, post his words.

Last time.

A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.

I wonder what you will copy and paste next.

He wants to terminate the articles in the Constitution that get in his way.

Unfit to ever be president again.

[johnwk2]

@LucyLou

@tnt

@johnwk2

No. You have not. You apparently made that up.

Trump, to the best of my knowledge, has never called for “. . . .the termination of the Constitution”.

If he has, post his words.

Last time.

A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.

I wonder what you will copy and paste next.

He wants to terminate the articles in the Constitution that get in his way.

According to you, but not his words.

But what we do know is, Kamala wants to subjugate the Constitution by adding a number of members who we all know will work to make the constitution mean what they want it to me, rather than abide by the text of the Constitution, and its documented legislative intent, which gives context to its text.

Kamala Harris supports radical legislation to pack the Supreme Court, appoint...

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership is known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.

[LucyLou]

@johnwk2

According to you, but not his words.

Dude. The oinker said he was willing to terminate the Constitution when it works out better for himself that way.

Unfit.

[johnwk2]

Post Trump’s words in context, or, as the old saying goes, put up or shut up.

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership is known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.

[Samm]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Samm

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Publius

Hard to imagine anyone would say something that crazy, right?

Ten years ago, I would have agreed.

Today? It’s par for the course.

Ten years ago, I would have said nobody could be so stupid as to interpret that statement as a call to terminate the Constitution. Today it’s par for the course.

As I have already said, he didn’t say he wanted to terminate the constitution, just parts of it.

And I asked “what parts?” and you never answered.

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Samm

And where in that statement is he advocating perpetration of a fraud that could terminate the Constitution?

He isn’t. He is saying that the alleged fraud allows for terminating parts of the constitution.

It does, if they are allowed to get away with it.

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Samm

If anything, he is issuing a warning (hyperbolically, as he is prone to do) that fraud could cause a constitutional crisis.

@Supreme_War_Pig

No, he is saying that the alleged fraud allows for the:

[quote=“tnt, post:400, topic:247837”]
termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.

Yes … The fraud terminates the rules. Or at least that’s one way to look at it, because the fraud is in violation of the Constitution.