Taylor Swift remains silent, avoids answering critical question about the candidate she has endorsed

Samm · 2024-09-22T01:06:36.591Z

Publius:

Smyrna:

DOLOOP:

She owes you nothing.

Absolutely nothing.

I disagree in that, her following is over a half a billion followers…so that influence requires some thought. Asking how she connected her dots is a reasonable question?

How much thought do you think Trump puts into the ridiculous things he constantly throws out?

TDS is such a burden.

The Trump thread is that way … =>

Or that way <= Take your pick.

Zander · 2024-09-22T01:30:29.741Z

Oh man y’all are still talking about Taylor Swift.

Can’t keep the name out the mouth for even a day.

Samm · 2024-09-22T01:42:05.461Z

Zander:

Oh man y’all are still talking about Taylor Swift.

Can’t keep the name out the mouth for even a day.

What’s the title of the thread? Why are you here?

Are you going to add something about Trump?

Zander · 2024-09-22T01:44:27.956Z

Why would I add something about trump to a Taylor swift thread.

I’m here to read the obsessive posts, and make observations Samm.

Samm · 2024-09-22T01:46:13.668Z

Because that’s what Libs do. Just ask @Publius, he’ll tell ya.

Commenting about Taylor Swift in a Taylor Swift thread is not obsessive … It’s expected.

Supreme_War_Pig · 2024-09-22T05:33:22.576Z

Samm:

Publius:

Why can’t you own up to the fact that your orange Jesus doesn’t understand or give a whit about the Constitution and move on?

I agree that Trump doesn’t understand the Constitution (he almost certainly has never read it) but by no honest interpretation of what he said, did he ever call for termination of the Constitution. Your queen spouted that out in one of her speeches and you© all lapped it up like good little dogs. Pathetic.

True. He just wants to terminate parts of it. Which is heaps better

Adam · 2024-09-22T06:32:33.826Z

Samm:

Zander:

Oh man y’all are still talking about Taylor Swift.

Can’t keep the name out the mouth for even a day.

What’s the title of the thread? Why are you here?

Are you going to add something about Trump?

You don’t get to tell people to stay on topic with a straight face.

Samm · 2024-09-22T08:36:06.520Z

Supreme_War_Pig:

Samm:

Publius:

Why can’t you own up to the fact that your orange Jesus doesn’t understand or give a whit about the Constitution and move on?

I agree that Trump doesn’t understand the Constitution (he almost certainly has never read it) but by no honest interpretation of what he said, did he ever call for termination of the Constitution. Your queen spouted that out in one of her speeches and you© all lapped it up like good little dogs. Pathetic.

True. He just wants to terminate parts of it. Which is heaps better

Like which parts? Can you post a quote?

Samm · 2024-09-22T08:38:16.844Z

Adam:

Samm:

Zander:

Oh man y’all are still talking about Taylor Swift.

Can’t keep the name out the mouth for even a day.

What’s the title of the thread? Why are you here?

Are you going to add something about Trump?

You don’t get to tell people to stay on topic with a straight face.

I didn’t tell him to stay on topic, I chided him for criticizing us for posting on topic.

tnt · 2024-09-22T12:15:04.367Z

Samm:

That doesn’t matter to me. What I am challenging is SWP’s assertion (“Well, she does specifically mention 4 things.”) that she was specific about why she supports Harris. She was not specific, she was vague.

it’s twitter.

And she’s a pop star.

tnt · 2024-09-22T12:16:43.297Z

Samm:

I agree that Trump doesn’t understand the Constitution (he almost certainly has never read it) but by no honest interpretation of what he said, did he ever call for termination of the Constitution. Your queen spouted that out in one of her speeches and you© all lapped it up like good little dogs. Pathetic.

What does this mean then?

A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.

tnt · 2024-09-22T12:17:41.274Z

Smyrna:

DOLOOP:

She owes you nothing.

Absolutely nothing.

I disagree in that, her following is over a half a billion followers…so that influence requires some thought. Asking how she connected her dots is a reasonable question?

She can use twitter however she chooses, just like you.

Supreme_War_Pig · 2024-09-22T12:48:12.301Z

A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution

Publius · 2024-09-22T12:58:14.871Z

Hard to imagine anyone would say something that crazy, right?

Supreme_War_Pig · 2024-09-22T13:04:31.593Z

Publius:

Hard to imagine anyone would say something that crazy, right?

Ten years ago, I would have agreed.

Today? It’s par for the course.

johnwk2 · 2024-09-22T20:37:39.139Z

Publius:

johnwk2:

You said that Trump called for ". . . .the termination of the Constitution. . . ", That was a lie and now you are deflecting rather than admit you lied.

Nowhere in what Trump WROTE does he call for the termination of the Constitution.

Admit you made that up and move on.

Yeah, that’s not going to happen.

Quote Trump’s words where her called for “. . . . the termination of the Constitution …” which is what you asserted.

johnwk2 · 2024-09-22T20:44:15.101Z

Supreme_War_Pig:

A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution

That is 100% true. If our election process is allowed to be riddled with fraud, in effect it is allowing for the termination of our system’s rules and our constitution.

JWK

“If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?”___ Justice Story

Samm · 2024-09-22T21:08:00.048Z

tnt:

Samm:

That doesn’t matter to me. What I am challenging is SWP’s assertion (“Well, she does specifically mention 4 things.”) that she was specific about why she supports Harris. She was not specific, she was vague.

it’s twitter.

And she’s a pop star.

That’s totally immaterial. She did not provide any specifics as to why she supports Harris which makes SWP’s assertion false. That’s the point we are discussing.

Samm · 2024-09-22T21:15:59.979Z

tnt:

Samm:

I agree that Trump doesn’t understand the Constitution (he almost certainly has never read it) but by no honest interpretation of what he said, did he ever call for termination of the Constitution. Your queen spouted that out in one of her speeches and you© all lapped it up like good little dogs. Pathetic.

What does this mean then?

A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.

It means that he thinks that a massive fraud of that type (unspecified) could violate rules, regulations and articles, found in the Constitution. Regardless of the veracity of that statement, it does NOT say he wants to terminate the Constitution. That you© (including Kamala) came up with that interpretation is mystifying to say the least.

johnwk2 · 2024-09-22T21:19:48.942Z

Just like the bloodbath, and other mischaracterizations. That is what the lying Democrat Leadership, and their operatives, do . . .make up ■■■■ .