Taylor Swift remains silent, avoids answering critical question about the candidate she has endorsed

Publius · 2024-09-20T18:12:08.480Z

I answered your ridiculous question with a straightforward “no.”

However, you have not stated whether you will be voting for Trump, even though he has advocated policies destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens - such as the termination of the Constitution. Are you for termination of the Constitution? Why do you keep side-stepping the question?

johnwk2 · 2024-09-20T18:21:44.295Z

Publius:

I answered your ridiculous question with a straightforward “no.”

And I responded to your “no” HERE, which you decided to ignore.

LucyLou · 2024-09-20T18:22:13.408Z

johnwk2:

kermode:

John,
Well from your perspective yes she has.
You’d have to ask her, but I doubt she shares your opinion.

Your deflective response is noted. My question to you was:

Has Taylor Swift not endorsed two candidates who advocate policies destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?

No she has not.

She does not share your opinion, and that’s all you have. An opinion.

LucyLou · 2024-09-20T18:22:47.800Z

johnwk2:

Is it not a fact these two candidates [Harris and Walz] advocate policies destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?

Not a fact.

PurpnGold · 2024-09-20T18:27:19.878Z

johnwk2:

Is it not a fact these two candidates [Harris and Walz] advocate policies destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?

No, it is not a fact.

johnwk2 · 2024-09-20T18:30:01.738Z

LucyLou:

johnwk2:

Is it not a fact these two candidates [Harris and Walz] advocate policies destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?

Not a fact.

The documented facts prove otherwise, e.g.:

See: THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE BIDEN-HARRIS ADMINISTRATION’S
OPEN-BORDERS POLICIES:

For more than three-and-a-half years, President Joe Biden and “border czar” Vice President Kamala Harris have orchestrated the largest mass release of illegal aliens into the country in American history. Well over 7 million illegal aliens are now in the United States because of the Biden-Harris Administration’s radical immigration policies.13 The results are all too predictable: cities overwhelmed, public services crushed, and communities shattered by the criminality of some illegal aliens.

Although the Biden-Harris Administration claims that illegal aliens are vetted before being released into the United States, the reality is much more disturbing. As one federal district court judge has observed, the checks that DHS currently performs on illegal aliens encountered at the southwest border should concern every American. As Judge Wetherell explained in 2023:

“Although DHS says it is screening arriving aliens . . . to determine if they are a public safety threat, the more persuasive evidence establishes that DHS cannot reliably make that determination. Indeed, according to [the Administration’s] own witnesses, DHS has no way to determine if an alien has a criminal history in his home country unless that country reports the information to the U.S. government or the alien self-reports. Therefore, DHS is mainly only screening aliens at the border to determine if they have previously committed a crime in the United States, and because many of these aliens are coming to the United States for the first time, DHS has no idea whether they have criminal histories or not.14”

And, with regard to Walz not advocating policies destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens, his record proves otherwise.

Tim Walz is all in with irreversible sexual mutilating surgery for minors LINK, strongly opposed legislation that would prohibit schools from allowing “a person whose sex is male” to participate in sports “designed for women or girls”, LINK; advocated legislation which ostensibly requires tampons in boy’s bathrooms LINK; and allowed BLM demonstrators to riot in Minneapolis in 2020 burning over 1,000 businesses and a police station to the ground, LINK, and even signed legislation providing state-funded health care, driver’s licenses and free college tuition to illegal entrant foreign nationals. LINK

The truth and facts cannot be changed to what they are not.

Publius · 2024-09-20T18:57:34.370Z

johnwk2:

Publius:

I answered your ridiculous question with a straightforward “no.”

And I responded to your “no” HERE, which you decided to ignore.

I gave it the attention it deserved.

Even IF everything you say is true, the choice comes down to some policy differences vs a candidate who has been convicted of numerous felonies, indicted for numerous more, stole military secrets from the federal government, and incited an insurrection, not to mention calling a self-professed “Black Nazi” transexual porn enthusiast “MLK on steroids.” Easy choice for me.

Nemesis · 2024-09-20T19:07:31.948Z

Again John makes the mistake of assuming that voting for a candidate = being in lock step with every position.

johnwk2 · 2024-09-20T19:14:59.658Z

Publius:

johnwk2:

Publius:

I answered your ridiculous question with a straightforward “no.”

And I responded to your “no” HERE, which you decided to ignore.

I gave it the attention it deserved.

Even IF everything you say is true, the choice comes down to some policy differences

No. It does not come down to some policy differences. It comes down to a significant list of the Kamala/Walz team’s policies which are destructive to the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens, vs the policies advocated by the Trump/Vance team, which actually advance the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens and would Make America Great Again.

Which of the policies advocated by the Trump/Vance team would be destructive to the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens?

JWK

Publius · 2024-09-20T19:36:34.616Z

johnwk2:

Publius:

johnwk2:

Publius:

I answered your ridiculous question with a straightforward “no.”

And I responded to your “no” HERE, which you decided to ignore.

I gave it the attention it deserved.

Even IF everything you say is true, the choice comes down to some policy differences

No. It does not come down to some policy differences. It comes down to a significant list of the Kamala/Walz team’s policies which are destructive to the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens, vs the policies advocated by the Trump/Vance team, which actually advance the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens and would Make America Great Again.

Which of the policies advocated by the Trump/Vance team would be destructive to the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens?

JWK

The termination of the Constitution, which Trump has publicly called for.

I would think you of all people would find that a tad concerning,

johnwk2 · 2024-09-20T19:46:48.198Z

Publius:

johnwk2:

Publius:

johnwk2:

Publius:

I answered your ridiculous question with a straightforward “no.”

And I responded to your “no” HERE, which you decided to ignore.

I gave it the attention it deserved.

Even IF everything you say is true, the choice comes down to some policy differences

No. It does not come down to some policy differences. It comes down to a significant list of the Kamala/Walz team’s policies which are destructive to the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens, vs the policies advocated by the Trump/Vance team, which actually advance the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens and would Make America Great Again.

Which of the policies advocated by the Trump/Vance team would be destructive to the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens?

JWK

The termination of the Constitution, which Trump has publicly called for.

So, you avoid pointing to any of the policies advocated by the Trump/Vance team, which would be destructive to the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens.

Samm · 2024-09-20T20:58:44.148Z

kermode:

Look up to see the question he just asked me.

So you get to ignore his other questions because he asked one that only Taylor can answer?

Samm · 2024-09-20T21:00:10.422Z

tnt:

Samm:

What answer? There have been numerous responses, but no one has answered his question.

Have you answered that question yourself?

He didn’t ask me, he asked you. But my answer is yes.

What’s your’s?

Supreme_War_Pig · 2024-09-20T21:02:09.811Z

johnwk2:

kermode:

John,
Well from your perspective yes she has.
You’d have to ask her, but I doubt she shares your opinion.

Your deflective response is noted. My question to you was:

Has Taylor Swift not endorsed two candidates who advocate policies destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?

No. She has endorsed 2 candidates whose policies align with her preferences.

Samm · 2024-09-20T21:02:54.766Z

tnt:

Samm:

That’s not true. He asked if “Kamala has not advocated policies destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?” That requires an answer from you (or any of your evasive buddies) not from Taylor.

I’ve answered that several times. He is stating his opinion, and it is one that I don’t agree with.

And then he repeats teh question…

No you haven’t, you’ve done nothing but dance around it. The pathetic thing about that is that it’s not a hard question and you’ve spent all this energy avoiding it. It must be exhausting being a Lib.

johnwk2 · 2024-09-20T21:03:45.347Z

Publius:

The termination of the Constitution, which Trump has publicly called for.

Trump wrote on Truth Social on December 3, 2022,

“So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections.”

The truth is, speaking with reference to the 2020 election and allegations of “MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION”, Trump opined, if the above was allowed, then it “. . . allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution . . . “, which is a logical conclusion.

If our elections are subverted, that, in and of itself, allows for, the termination [subjugation] of our Constitution.

Nowhere in what Trump wrote, does Trump call for the “termination of the Constitution”. You made that ■■■■ up.

Why do you find it necessary to make up ■■■■ ?

PurpnGold · 2024-09-20T21:04:10.332Z

Samm:

tnt:

Samm:

That’s not true. He asked if “Kamala has not advocated policies destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?” That requires an answer from you (or any of your evasive buddies) not from Taylor.

I’ve answered that several times. He is stating his opinion, and it is one that I don’t agree with.

And then he repeats teh question…

No you haven’t, you’ve done nothing but dance around it. The pathetic thing about that is that it’s not a hard question and you’ve spent all this energy avoiding it. It must be exhausting being a Lib.

Nobody avoided the question.

Everyone said “No” and some added additional thoughts.

Samm · 2024-09-20T21:04:55.843Z

DisturbedGuy:

10000013242048×1515 317 KB

Are you slamming CNN there?

Samm · 2024-09-20T21:12:35.809Z

PurpnGold:

johnwk2:

Is it not a fact these two candidates [Harris and Walz] advocate policies destructive to the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?

No, it is not a fact.

Advocating what are effectively open borders and the dissemination of large numbers of illegal immigrants into communities all across the nation is almost by definition destructive to the United States destructive to the general welfare of the nation and the citizens. Those people are a huge burden on the country and its citizens. That IS a fact.

johnwk2 · 2024-09-20T21:13:14.563Z

PurpnGold:

Everyone said “No”

After I repeatedly asked the question.

Moving on, do tell, which of the policies advocated by the Trump/Vance team would be destructive to the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens?

We already know some of the destructive policies of the Kamala/Trump Team.

So what are the alleged policies of the Trump/Vance team which are destructive to the common defense and general welfare of the United States and her citizens?