Suspect arrested for allegedly orchestrating shootings at homes of Democrats

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/17/us/solomon-pena-arrested-new-mexico-shootings/index.html

Officers arrested Peña on suspicion of “helping orchestrate and participate in these four shootings, either at his request or he conducted them personally, himself,” Hartsock added.

After losing, Peña approached the senators and commissioners at their homes with paperwork claiming there was fraud involved in the elections, Albuquerque Police Director of Communications Gilbert Gallegos said.

Dude made a whole terrorist cell.

Toss him under the jail, glad Republicans didn’t elect him. I can’t see why anyone voted for him given his criminal past.

2 Likes

If he’s guilty, lock him up!

1 Like

Good catch. The guy is a menace.

It probably wasn’t for lack of trying.

You probably voted for him, right?

Not being from his district I think I can only vote Republican there.

But not being from his district I didn’t.

Did the RNC give him any cash? Because anyone can run as a Republican.

2 Likes

The RNC doesn’t fund campaigns for state legislature, that’d be the state-level party.

But seeing as how this seat is pretty safely (D), I doubt he got much funding at all.

Unless democrats voted for him, I’m not sure if you have a point.

Peña has a promising future at the FBI . . .

1 Like

And he ran the primary unopposed, republicans dropped the ball by not running someone against him, I’ll give you that.

1 Like

We all know there is a certain percentage of people who know nothing about a candidate and just vote R or D. And we have seen nuts slip in on both sides if they run unopposed in the primary because of it.

Sure, but saying you’re glad Republicans didn’t elect him implies they didn’t try.

Some people voted for him, is there a breakdown by party of who did? In any case I cede that some republicans voted for him, the question is how many knew how bad his background was and how many just blindly pulled the R lever. Traditionally smash and grab felons don’t do very well with Republican voters so I strongly suspect most of his votes were of the latter as opposed to the former explanation.

How much money did he raise?

Also pretty sure none of them voted for him to go around shooting at democrats if he lost.

Oh and the irony is, the guy he ran against, who tried to have him removed from the ballot because of his criminal past, voted to restore voting rights and eligibility to run for office for convicted felons.

1 Like

I don’t think that anyone will (or should) blame the voters for any part of this. It is clear that the guy is a nut case. I do agree that there are a lot of folks who pull the lever depending what letter follows the name.
It has never surprised me that there are a lot of one issue, one party voters out there.

Wasn’t it the overturning of that law that opened the way for Pena?

Meaning the law, as written, would have precluded Pena from running?

Doesn’t sound like ironic as much as enforcement.