Supreme Court rules in favor of Petitioner Masterpiece Cakeshop

[Grimalken]

@gooddad409

My post wasn’t directed so much at you as the folks who use it as a tactic to try and get one to jumping through endless hoops upon their demands. I could name several people but will refrain from doing so.

You aren’t on the list.

I see. Do you mean the people who want us to hold their hand, lead them to the information to explain our position, and then refuse to read it, acknowledge it, and still demand we write an essay to rehash the past twenty years, in order to bring them up to speed? Those people?

[gooddad409]

@biggestal99

well that solves that. No wedding cakes.

Allan

Going that route is better than violating their Christian beliefs.

[gooddad409]

@Grimalken

@gooddad409

My post wasn’t directed so much at you as the folks who use it as a tactic to try and get one to jumping through endless hoops upon their demands. I could name several people but will refrain from doing so.

You aren’t on the list.

I see. Do you mean the people who want us to hold their hand, lead them to the information to explain our position, and then refuse to read it, acknowledge it, and still demand we write an essay to rehash the past twenty years, in order to bring them up to speed? Those people?

Yes those people!

[biggestal99]

going that way makes equality the name of the game.

everyone cant buy his creations.

Allan

[biggestal99]

If he cant provide wedding wedding cakes to gays, he cant provide them for straights.

allan

[gooddad409]

Well that violates the 1st amendments(forcing one to do something that violates their religious beliefs) but as long as gays choose to be the south end of north bound horses it is the safe route for Christians.

[Grimalken]

And that’s the rub, isn’t it? Getting married is legal. I could see a business owner refusing to sell a product or service, if he knew it was going to be used to perform an illegal act.

Besides, the cake has nothing to do with the wedding ceremony, so neither the baker of the cake, or the cake participate in the wedding ceremony.

Besides, many people get married without a cake, which is just more proof that it’s not needed to get married.

[komobu]

You guy lost. Yes he can.

[biggestal99]

you obviously didnt read the link I posted. He is not providing wedding cakes to anyone.

Allan

[gooddad409]

He’s not providing wedding cakes anymore but the gay couple didn’t get a big payola either.

[WuWei]

The 1st Amendment is law.

[gooddad409]

A part of the BoR even.

[WuWei]

Equality for everybody but the property owner. Can he drag them in a demand they buy a cake under penalty of law?

[WorldWatcher]

@WuWei

Equality for everybody but the property owner. Can he drag them in a demand they buy a cake under penalty of law?

No.

However a gay shop owner can’t refuse him service because of his religion either. (Under both federal and state law.)

.>>>>

[gooddad409]

@WorldWatcher

@WuWei

Equality for everybody but the property owner. Can he drag them in a demand they buy a cake under penalty of law?

No.

However a gay shop owner can’t refuse him service because of his religion either. (Under both federal and state law.)

.>>>>

Experiments have been done to see if gay bakers would bake cakes with christian messages on them and quite often they will not.

Christians just aren’t nasty enough to sue them over it. Better standards.

[WorldWatcher]

@gooddad409

@WorldWatcher

@WuWei

Equality for everybody but the property owner. Can he drag them in a demand they buy a cake under penalty of law?

No.

However a gay shop owner can’t refuse him service because of his religion either. (Under both federal and state law.)

.>>>>

Experiments have been done to see if gay bakers would bake cakes with christian messages on them and quite often they will not.

Christians just aren’t nasty enough to sue them over it. Better standards.

Really,

Please share with us where this occurred.

If you are talking about the Michigan “investigative videos” - Pssst sexual orientation isn’t covered under Michigan PA law.

.>>>>

[WuWei]

That’s the claim. I know, I know, there are two cases…

Perhaps you didn’t understand my question. I wasn’t asking about reversing roles.

[WuWei]

Is religion?

[WorldWatcher]

@WuWei

Is religion?

Yes

.>>>>>>

[WuWei]

Interesting.