The same sex couple would have to have “tangible” harm to challenge the law. The couple didn’t challenge the validity of the law. They reported the violation of the law to the appropriate authority who then took action.
Mr. Phillips challenged the law, however the SCOTUS didn’t decide if the baker gets special rights to ignore the law, they reversed the lower court because of how the Commission processed the case exibiting an undue bias which tainted the concept of equal treatment.
.>>>>
Homosexuals deserve more respect than pious people. This is obvious. Believing in God is a choice.
There is nothing unconstitutional about generally applicable laws regulating commerce.
BTW - This wasn’t a federal law, it was a State law, which under the 10th Amendment, allows States to regulate intrastate commerce.
.>>>>
So slavery is a-ok as long as it’s only affecting intrastate commerce. You know 10th amendment and all. 
komobu
1012
This is where I am afraid we may be heading.
komobu
1013
With comments like this you are displaying that you are the intolerant bigot. You expect or even demand that Christians fully accept, support, and even embrace the homosexual life style, but you wont move an inch to even be tolerant of theirs. Remove your hate. You will be happier.
ain’t gonna happen. the indoctrination is complete for most of their ilk. For libs, up is down, men are women, and hate is love.
Except that a lot of Christians think that gays should have no rights because they think its a choice, which totally ignores the fact that religion is a choice.
Read the Constitution some time, the 13th Amendment reads “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”
Prior to the 13th Amendment some state had slavery, some didn’t. It wasn’t “OK” by our standards but it was legal.
.>>>>
I found one Abe,s buggy rides in bird in hand, pa.
Allan
<pay no attention to the US constitution, which identifies religion as protected but says nothing about homosex>
Fallacy: SCOTUS can be wrong.
Fact: SCOTUS makes errors, which are correctable.
SCOTUS can’t be wrong.
Allan
Every person deserves an equal amount of respect as long as they show the same respect to their fellow man.
SCOTUS says states can protect gays from people like the baker.
Clearly stated.
Allan
Dred Scott
SCOTUS says… does not make it right.
as I said SCOTUS can make errors but is NEVER wrong.
they corrected their DRED SCOTT error.
Allan
Well, that didn’t take long.
I guess selling a hammer to a gay person is somehow a sin.
I’m just following your logic. Doesn’t matter what the 13th says since it can be ignored under the 10th. Just like the 1st.
