Supreme Court Nominee

[Sknyluv]

@WuWei

I prefer to quietly remind you what you did. At every turn.

And yet, you’ll still be the only person who cares.

[Ben_Natuf]

for the supreme court precedent is over rated. as the nominee said, all scotus decisions are precedential.

stare decisis is nothiing but scotus excuse to continue “precedents” they know should be overturned but would display the limit of their authority.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Trump nominated 7 I’m sure none of them have white husbands. Right?

Correct.

That’s likely incorrect.

Prove me wrong.

[WuWei]

@Sknyluv

@WuWei

I prefer to quietly remind you what you did. At every turn.

And yet, you’ll still be the only person who cares.

That’s fine. Keep building the ressentiment. Keep foisting these useful idiots on the country.

[Ben_Natuf]

false. they didn’t disqualify anyone based on that criteria.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Trump nominated 7 I’m sure none of them have white husbands. Right?

Correct.

That’s likely incorrect.

Prove me wrong.

Don’t feel like it right now. It would be very time consuming since it is rare that you know the husband of a court appointment unless you are nominated for an SC seat.

But I am super confident that at least one of his picks, have a white husband.

I am also confident that of his 84% of white people he selected… they all have white spouses.

[Sknyluv]

@WuWei

@Sknyluv

@WuWei

I prefer to quietly remind you what you did. At every turn.

And yet, you’ll still be the only person who cares.

That’s fine. Keep building the ressentiment. Keep foisting these useful idiots on the country.

Please explain your issue with black women marrying white men.

[PurpnGold]

@Ben_Natuf

false. they didn’t disqualify anyone based on that criteria.

They had to… how do you select just one person without disqualifying many others?

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

You deny she’s a Crit?

I don’t know what you’re talking about.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

Don’t feel like it right now.

I understand.

[WuWei]

Yes you do.

[Ben_Natuf]

had nothing to do with that criteria

outcome =/= opportunity

[Borgia_dude]

@Ben_Natuf

twisted logic.

i didn’t disqualify her, biden did. apparently he believes you can.

and i didn’t disqualify 100% of males, 100% of hispanics, 100% of asians, and 1/2 the black population from consideration. biden did

You didn’t have an issue with Trump doing it so I find your feigned outrage humorous.

[Borgia_dude]

@Ben_Natuf

for the supreme court precedent is over rated. as the nominee said, all scotus decisions are precedential.

stare decisis is nothiing but scotus excuse to continue “precedents” they know should be overturned but would display the limit of their authority.

Your opinion is noted but would result in chaos, IMO.

[Ben_Natuf]

find a single quote from me stating i agreed with limiting the nominating pool by sex, race, or any factor other than judicial temperment

[Borgia_dude]

@Ben_Natuf

find a single quote from me stating i agreed with limiting the nominating pool by sex, race, or any factor other than judicial temperment

Find your contemporaneous quote complaining when Trump said he would nominate a woman.

[Ben_Natuf]

not adhering to the constitution is the cause of chaos, continuing to do so doesn’t lessen it

[WuWei]

@Sknyluv

Please explain your issue with black women marrying white men.

Why do you feefee I have an issue with it? I love it, it spells the doom of the “RACISM EVERYWHERE!” crutch. We’re almost there.

My grievances are with Brandon’s faux antiracism.

[Borgia_dude]

@Ben_Natuf

not adhering to the constitution is the cause of chaos, continuing to do so doesn’t lessen it

So simplistic.

[Ben_Natuf]

you claimed i did not have a problem, you prove it.

once again leftist believe they can read minds and just because they project a thing to be true it is.

hint: its not