Subsidizing Coal and Nuclear

So, in an effort to support your assertion that Obama regs killed the coal industry, you link to an article that refutes that notion? Ok… odd tactic. lol

Let’s check out your first post.

You stated that “Until Obama’s coal killing regulations coal jobs and employement had been on a steady increase during this century and the latter portion of the last decade of the the 20th century.” Let’s see what the numbers say.

Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Make sure you’ve got the dates selected form '85 to present.

Once you do you’ll notice that since '85, coal mining jobs were in precipitous free-fall, until it stopped around 2000. So, not sure how a free-fall equates to an increase in employment? Interesting…

You then state “Mechanization had reduced the total labor force back in the seventies and eighties but more mines and production led to increases in production and hiring until again, Obama’s war on coal began.” Which is interesting for a couple of reasons. First, up until '85, coal jobs were increasing… even in the 70’s, and yes the first half of the 80’s. Then we see that precipitous drop in employment… so what about the number of mines? You state they were increasing… and yet, this graph here shows precisely the opposite.
https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20170818_R44922_images_0a6484a7288416f98d19748450105f6c393abfae.png (Image from this page The U.S. Coal Industry: Historical Trends and Recent Developments - EveryCRSReport.com)

Hmmmm… it’s interesting, because once again, data demonstrates precisely the opposite of what you’re saying, yet you’re just being so damn adamant, that it’s almost convincing…

Almost.

Onr time I jokes the right became the party of no we can’t.

Healthcare renewable energy etc all you here is we can’t do it.

As much/many as were included in the reactor packages.

I said the increase began in the late nineties/early 2000’s and that’s exactly what the figures I provided showed.

They also showed the recent decline began after those reg’s were put into place many of which did not go into effect until Obama’s second term.

New mines came online every year as old mines played out and the production per worker went up dramatically with modern mechanization.

None, WR, zero spent fuel rods have been launched into space. Keep trying.

You said nothing about “spent fuel rods”.

An honest discussion would be a very refreshing change.

lake Ontario has been a dumping ground for a long time almost as bad as Erie.

We aren’t discussing typical hydroelectric plants.

And the federal biologists inspected the kill and said it was completely natural due to a rapid shift in temperatures.

Fuel rods are not lunched into space, we bury it underground.

Productivity in coal mines is down substantially in the last 15 years.

Decreased Productivity ­ American mines are producing coal less efficiently than in the past. Productivity has declined 30% since its peak in 2000.2 Increased underground mining explains some of the job increases, as it requires more workers per unit of production compared to strip mining.
This trend is particularly evident in Central Appalachia, where coal mining jobs have increased from 28,552 in 2000 to 33,029 in 2012 (+16%) despite total coal production decreasing from 264 million short tons in 2000 to 147 million short tons (­44%) over the same period.3

It does when you read the post I replied to.

That is all we have been discussing, spent fuel rods from municipal use reactors, “honest discussion”… you are a joke.

The waste refers to nuclear waste. Not waste sodium.

Good grief.

Lake Erie use to be classed as a “Dead” Lake due to dumping but thank to hard work by both sides it no longer is classed as such.

They built one of those in Connecticut in 1929 and it is still in use today.

most plants are old kept together by routine maintenance.

Not if you also read the post I was replying too which was concerning nuclear waste…

Pretty much farming killed lake Eire till we fixed it.