Stupid Ass Woke Drug Smuggler Begging The Country for a Save

[WuWei]

@FreeAndClear

We don’t all look alike

You do to me. Not libs, critprogs. Admittedly as a solo you’re tolerable.

Get off the bandwagon.

[WuWei]

@FreeAndClear

I am not scared.

Sure you are.

[FreeAndClear]

@WuWei

@FreeAndClear

I am not scared.

Sure you are.

Nuh uh

[WuWei]

You claim they are a danger to all communities. Was denying them bail legitimate?

[FreeAndClear]

@WuWei

You claim they are a danger to all communities. Was denying them bail legitimate?

I claim that their planning can fall into the definition of being a danger to the community.

Me in a black robe - no Bail should be reserved for very specific cases - murder, clear recidivism, sexual offenses against minors.

[WuWei]

What does the Bail Act of 1984 say?

[Samm]

@TommyLucchese

@WuWei

8th Amendment.

Lol this is a thread you started where you cheered lustily for an American to do a decade in prison for a half gram vape cartridge and even called her a drug smuggler all over your fees-fees being hurt and now you’re crying not getting bail is cruel and unusual punishment.

The 8th Amendment does not say that denying bail is cruel and unusual punishment.

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

Yes to the community.

Please elaborate.

[Samm]

@Axxowiz

Amanda Knox comes to mind and these are European counties being discussed anytime I traveled to non European countries I took their law very seriously.

Amanda Knox wasn’t arrested and tried for a crime that was unique to Italy, or any other country for that matter.

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

Your community too. People who believe that they should overthrow the government and plan for it are a danger to the community.

Do you not understand how absurd that argument is in context with the Jan 6 indictments?

[FreeAndClear]

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

Your community too. People who believe that they should overthrow the government and plan for it are a danger to the community.

Do you not understand how absurd that argument is in context with the Jan 6 indictments?

Again the guys who planned. I referencing judt that subset. It was still a riot and not an insurrection.

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

@WuWei

@FreeAndClear

Your community too. People who believe that they should overthrow the government and plan for it are a danger to the community.

It 2as a 7 hour event. Singularly focused. What are they going to do to my community, attack the community center?

The length of the event is irrelevant. The planning is relevant. I can’t name a single community that won’t be directly affected by a violent change in the federal government and the consequences that flow form that.

What community would be affected by those people being out of custody on bail? What do you think they were going to do and to whom if they were allowed to go home?

[FreeAndClear]

I don’t agree with the decision. Never said i did. We are discussing what falls into the very subjective definition of danger to the community n

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

Them planning is a danger.

Planning what? Danger to whom? Please elaborate.

[FreeAndClear]

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

Them planning is a danger.

Planning what? Danger to whom? Please elaborate.

To the community. You know what the planning involved. Again. I didn’t say i agree. Not once.

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

@WuWei

@FreeAndClear

I did nothing of the sort. They didn’t overthrow anything. We were discussing what it means to be a danger to the community. Them planning is a danger. That’s it.

If it didn’t happen, why are you scared of it happening while they’re out on bail awaiting trial for it not happening?

I am not scared. We we’re discussing what it means to be a danger to the community. It’s not an objective standard. It never was.

You obviously are scared, or you wouldn’t be endorsing the denial of bail. But you haven’t described what you are scared of. “Danger to the community” doesn’t describe anything.

[FreeAndClear]

Discussing what falls into the subjective definition of danger to community isn’t endorsing it

I really want to know who taught you guys to discuss things like this. Like who is holding lessons on obfuscation.?

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

Your community too. People who believe that they should overthrow the government and plan for it are a danger to the community.

Do you not understand how absurd that argument is in context with the Jan 6 indictments?

Again the guys who planned. I referencing judt that subset. It was still a riot and not an insurrection.

They don’t plan anything that either put or continues to put the community in danger.

[FreeAndClear]

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

Your community too. People who believe that they should overthrow the government and plan for it are a danger to the community.

Do you not understand how absurd that argument is in context with the Jan 6 indictments?

Again the guys who planned. I referencing judt that subset. It was still a riot and not an insurrection.

They don’t plan anything that either put or continues to put the community in danger.

That’s great. I don’t necessarily disagree.

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

I don’t agree with the decision. Never said i did. We are discussing what falls into the very subjective definition of danger to the community n

But yet you are defending that action.