Stop calling evidence circumstantial

Y’all got things bass ackwards!

For instance:
You say that CV-19 is evidence of wide spread mail in voting. There is zero data to back that claim. It seems logical to conclude that but that is not proof.

Ok. All the ballots that were received is proof. No it is not. It is evidence, but of what?

All the ballots that were mailed without request made it easier to vote. That is pure speculation. Voting is very easy without unsolicited mailed ballots. I have not found data showing that a ballot in hand will motivate voting habit change.

There is a bunch more but I’m tired of typing.

10 posts were merged into an existing topic: Circumstantial evidence piling up for massive voting fraud including certain Senate Races too

A post was merged into an existing topic: Coronavirus Thread Political II