Exactly. They are in Georgia which allows that kind protest.
In jersey it would be frowned upon with arrests of the perps.
Allan
Exactly. They are in Georgia which allows that kind protest.
In jersey it would be frowned upon with arrests of the perps.
Allan
There was no threat and no takeover of the capitol by the protesters.
Ditto with Stone Mountain. I’m trying to lay my finger on what else is different.
It’ll come to me eventually.
Why thank you for your kind recognition kind sir.
In the future, please use the @ feature so people don’t miss your compliments.
WuWei:Yeah for the 1st and 2nd Amendments! And the day after Independence Day!
Exactly. They are in Georgia which allows that kind protest.
In jersey it would be frowned upon with arrests of the perps.
Allan
Then “jersey” is in violation of the US Constitution and should be held in abeyance until it un ■■■■■ itself.
DOLOOP: sikofit: biggestal99:Funny I didn’t see a post from you about the “takeover” of the Michigan state capital building
That was diffeRent.
People legally carrying firearms during a lawful protest.
Oh, the horror of it all!
Indeed. And we’re also seeing the nervous twittering of “escalation” and “takeover” and expressions of the likelihood it will turn to violence. So often there is some distinguishing characteristic that has to be expressed when black Americans are the ones legally bearing Arms. It’s a frequent strain and calls out the credibility of many defenses of the second amendment, because there are so many that elevate its value only when certain populations exercise it.
I’ve been on Sean’s board since 2005. If you want to see scrupulous and consistent application of a defense of the second amendment regardless of race or population, look to sneaky’s posts.
If you want to see relativism, there are other viewpoints that get frequent expression.
Why thank you for your kind recognition kind sir.
In the future, please use the @ feature so people don’t miss your compliments.
I thought about that but figured it would look too much like sucking up to mod, and that’s a reputation I’d rather avoid.
Cool. I’ll give that a try. Thanks.
I thought about that but figured it would look too much like sucking up to mod, and that’s a reputation I’d rather avoid.
I understand your trepidation, give it not a second thought.
Thanks again.
BLM is a terrorist organization
That is what the RW echo chamber pushes daily.
Cool. I’ll give that a try. Thanks.
You know you’re my guy Ray Man.
If there was any doubt the last couple of months have eliminated it.
Ditto hermano.
If there was any doubt the last couple of months have eliminated it.
For some, there was never doubt.
The rest of America, including corporate America, is slowly opening their eyes to the inequitable system in place. I am very aware, many, will keep their eyes shut.
No, they are simply bowing to coercion.
No, they are simply bowing to coercion.
Some people will always see it that way.
Yes, those who can accept the truth.
FloridaYankee: WuWei:I don’t care for the “C”.
Coalition? Seems okay to me. What would you change it to?
Or just get rid of it altogether? That I like.
I’m thinking leave it off. What’s it a coalition of.
Serious folks. At first glance at least.
If there was any doubt the last couple of months have eliminated it.
What terrorist acts have BLM sanctioned?
Yes, those who can accept the truth.
Nope. Some people refuse to see the truth, and make up their own version, of their truth.
I am very aware of that, and adjust accordingly.
WuWei: FloridaYankee: WuWei:I don’t care for the “C”.
Coalition? Seems okay to me. What would you change it to?
Or just get rid of it altogether? That I like.
I’m thinking leave it off. What’s it a coalition of.
Serious folks. At first glance at least.
Does a coalition not conjure organization of multiple groups united for a common purpose?