Or is this just another one of your excuses to close your eyes and cover your ears to scummy things the people YOU support do, because guess what, it’s not just libs that do slimy ■■■■■
Whatever the reason, it’s inevitable that the results will be politicized, since coastal states tend to favor Democrats, and Republicans dominate the country’s center.
Yup. This thread is PROOF that the results will be pliticized even though . . .
One was that regions hit harder by the virus, or that had the earliest lockdowns, may have had more trouble getting lending started. Another was that more businesses in hard-hit states may not have applied because the program isn’t enough to make a difference for them. Tedeschi also floated the possibility that businesses in some states had better pre-existing relationships with community banks that were able to get applications submitted quickly.
They show the results most likely were NOT the results of politics.
not just that, but the estimate of eligible payrolls is skewed to lower cost areas. so we start with fewer eligible payrolls in higher cost/higher wage areas.
Because your question is irrelevant to the issue at hand. We are discussing the rate at which loans are being approved. You’re implying that if one loan was approved from a state than everything is fine, which is clearly not the case.
You don’t get to decide what I’m basing my thinking on.
Either way libs have their panties all up in a twist because someone told that that conservative states received more money then them. That’s what this outrage is all about is it not?