I keep reading liberals talking about the President being divisive…that he needs to unite us.

Those same people have spent three years investigating every move every tweet…investigating in search of a crime IMHO.

Last night Dems sat on their hands while a variety of achievements for all Americans were discussed, the Speaker if the House, a classless old bat who’s tune has passed, tore up the speech on camera at the conclusion…

My point is this…it’s a free country and you can choose to think and do whatever you want. But if you are going to choose to be divided don’t bitch about the other guy being divisive.

5 Likes

Not at all. The bull ■■■■ voodoo is.

Pelosi was ridiculously infantile last night. I always hated her as speaker…when Bush was President she’d sit behind him and smack her lips when he said something she didn’t like. This is just more infantile actions spawned on by the other person in the room acting infantile…Trump. Both ridiculously infantile.

Of course it does.

My quickly made point was simply that your single opinion is not what matters. It’s the will of the pope in general expressed through the democratic processes outlined in the constitution that matter.

YOU might not want anything the democrats serve up, but that’s not what matters. What counts is, what do MOST people want?

And the existing of the democratic party, and the strong support they have among millions of americans mean that those policies are wanted. Therefore, they are valid.

Likewise, I didn’t want the tax cuts for wall streeters. But millions of americans did. And that’s what rules the day.

1 Like

Yes that is what I meant. “Centrist”. His speech was very political “centrist”.

Also populist as well.

It wasn’t last night.

And there we have it.

1 Like

Paging Dr. Freud! Paging Dr. Freud!

1 Like

I am pretty sure this is what he meant.

A way to pay in for low up front cost if you are healthy.

:hospital:

Thank you. I don’t like to question what I think are spelling errors, because I know Auto Correct can be a pain…And I make my share of spelling errors. While it drives me nuts when I see things misspelled or bad grammar…I don’t call it out. I make my share of mistakes as well. I was really trying to figure out what was meant. I hope you understand where I was coming from. Didn’t mean for you think I was calling you out on spelling. That’s the kind of thing I don’t want to be known for.

And there are millions of conservative like myself. Will you compromise with me? Well you accept cutting goverment at least 1/3? Because I would love to cut it by 2/3 to 3/4 across the board except for SS and Medicare since people paid into, goverment must keep it’s promise.

1 Like

"Our new plans are up to 60 percent less expensive. "

Interesting that you left the “up to” out.

1 Like

That’s funny.

You mean it wasn’t JUST LAST NIGHT…I agree…I have no love for that woman at all. Every time she bats her eyelashes and tries to play the poor me lady in a room full of men card…it makes me laugh. I’ll never forget her giant gavel…It was symbolic to me of the Penis she was trying to show she had.

He said we need to compromise and what does he do? Discarded what you idea outright.

Yes. The ■■■■■■■■■ voodoo” that’s been used in economic models for centuries. :laughing: Must be the deeeeeep state

Sure…of course. I just offered to discuss abortion with you.

Remember Obama? He cut the size of the government considerably while compromising with the republicans. It can be done.

Hell, Clinton - you know, the Evil Clinton Liberal - cut entitlements for god’s sake!

I’m more than happy to discuss, consider and compromise. We used to do that a lot more here on this forum.

1 Like

Well said!!

:heavy_division_sign:

Not to a socialist.

2 Likes

Slowing the growth of goverment isn’t cutting it. Nice try in BSing me with left-wing hack talking point.

I’m talking about actual cuts in goverment…big time. Specially with intrusive nature of some of those agencies.

1 Like