interesting but you would agree tangental to my point. the point is that the naming convention is a century if not more old. and upending such a convention simply because Trump spoke words is a number of things each of them bad. you could say it’s ignorant if the person attacking does not realize the thing existed long before trumps male DNA component swam up the birth canal. you could say that if they weren’t ignorant of that fact but used it to attack President Trump under false pretense that it is deliberately deceitful. that anyone doing so is estimating that their reader or listener is an ignorant fool who won’t know any better. As I said you can garner a number of things from the current angle Trump’s foes are using.
our response was not sluggish. in fact he got called a xenophobe and racist because he closed of travel to and from china. the national response level was better than obama’s WRT the two epidemics that occurred during his administration; with the following exceptions: for some reason the Obama administration chose not restock expendable epidemic supplies such as masks, face shields, gloves and tyvek suits. other than that the response plan and testing system was tailored to small scale testing rather than the large scale testing now needed. so this administration had to spin that up and had to restructure the response plan and task organization for a nation wide event.
states and cities did have sluggish responses because for example NYC did not requisition additional ventilators when it was considering it a few years ago and instead decided to develop a plan to ration what they had on hand. then when this hit they cried about the federal govt not having ventilators on hand. that was not part of the federal plan. But Trump did put out a call for increased production and modification of suitable devices into the type of ventilator needed. as to testing you can’t make a test for a disease no one had heard of until you have heard of it. even then making and assessing the initial test kits let alone full on mass production takes a bit of time. thanks to this emergency though that is changing the labs can now have test kits much quicker than even possible 8 months ago… and even so the idiots calling for 100 percent testing are woefully ignorant.
The feds addressed none of the above until mid-March…a entire month later than they could have.
Closing travel from China (incompletely, btw) was a step, but by itself was a woefully insufficient response.
So…why the month-long delay with further additional steps? Why the national health emergency declared mid-March instead of right when the travel ban from China was initiated?
Our hospital system wasn’t overwhelmed in 2009-10.
We had proven treatment protocols that allowed our emergency systems to be overtaxed.
Unlike all of you, I don’t have the memory of a gnat. 2009-10 wasn’t an age and an age ago.
Also while Obama did not declare a national health emergency, he DID call a public health emergency within two days of the first cases OVERALL being diagnosed…that activated more activity than has happened in the first three months here.
wasn’t sure if i was conflating SARS with MERS. so yeah. i don’t often go looking every detail up. i go from memory. i haz one. and it works (most of the time.) someone with a memory is a problem for people whose position changes on any topic depending on who is in or out of power in washington. be they reporters, pundits, comentators , politicians or forum denizens.