I don’t agree with it but it seems to be a policy for the Olympics not just a U.S. thing, I dug this up.
“THC is classified as a Substance of Abuse because it is “frequently abused in society outside of the context of sport.” As such, “all natural and synthetic cannabinoids are prohibited” by the World Anti-Doping Code.
It is no longer treated as a performance-enhancing drug, use of which would be banned year-round, but athletes are restricted from actively using marijuana before and during competition windows.
Recreational use outside of competition isn’t prohibited, but lingering traces can trigger a positive test and result in an athlete’s disqualification"
I think this is awful, but these rules aren’t U.S. exclusive rules - unfortunately, she knew the risk. Her public statement is absolutely gut wrenching and she’s taken full responsibility for her actions. That’s so damn rare in these times that I’m now a fan of hers for life.
50 ng/dl sounds like a lot, and positives go through a confirmation test to determine if it is confirmed or a false positive.
I admire her for admitting her action & not asking the games adapt to her. Still am not losing sleep over her choice of this substance & feel the Committee needs to get in the modern area & discontinue THC as a banned substance.
I don’t cry for Richardson. The rules are the rules, and I have no doubt she knows them, or that she knew them at the time she chose to partake of the substance.
But that’s not the actual point of the thread. Her situation is just a springboard for the larger question.
The whole business of eligibility is warped and disordered now. Alter your body to become a pseudo-woman, and you’re still good to compete. (As a woman!) Celebrate making the team with a doobie, and you’re out on your ass.
ESPN’s Brett Okamoto tweeted to clear up rumours over whether it was CBD or not, saying: "Nate Diaz (@NateDiaz209) was smoking marijuana on stage not CBD, his team tells me.
I’ve yet to find a smokable cbd that won’t trip off a test.
License and tax evasion, illegal grows on public lands, etc. I took a lil google satellite trip through the Emerald Triangle the other day while also looking at realtor app and you’ll find well setup beautiful farm properties for what seems cheap and you’ll wonder why and it will say “seller lost license”. If they bought it to be a commercial grow and can’t pass muster then its just another failing businesses and you either sell on the grey/black market and get busted or sell the farm I guess.
For the licensing side, looks like Oklahoma is the state that’s figured it out best, which is unexpected because they don’t even have recreational yet, just medical.