This is another Soros shadow organization. Soros’ “Open Society Foundations” seriously need to be investigated and take that rich old bastards ability to fund his anti-American causes.
3 Likes
Soros is an evil man imo.
Certainly an America hater/America laster.
1 Like
Interested to know why you think he is evil?
Start here
2 Likes
He’s no friend to our country for sure.
Abolishing cash bail for non violent offenders is IMHO a good thing. Anyone deemed violent or a threat to the public no bail but everyone else out on no cash bail.
Police reform yes but defunding police depts is the most idiotic and insane idea ever to come out of the left.
He is an evil anti-American, a progressive liberal who funds woke leftist liberal progressives in elected offices like State AG’s and SOS’s which is the main reason for the increase in the no bail, catch & release, misdemeanor less than $900 thefts crime wave throughout the country, as well as voter manipulation & fraud.
2 Likes
Be specific. Shoplifting violations are “non-violent” and laws for store theft have put a value on the amount of stolen goods before it actually becomes more serious than jaywalking. It’s worked out well doncha think? Retail stores and pharmacies are closing in these cities. Flash mob thieves clean out the stores then they move on to the jewelry stores.
Great idea. All thieves should be arrested, detained, prosecuted and sentenced according to the law.
3 Likes
Rich people that give to causes I don’t like should be investigated and stopped.
Rich people that give to causes I like are cool.
1 Like
Depends on the cause more than the political persuasion of the donor. Nobody would be complaining if he was giving money to the Red Cross. But you knew that.
2 Likes
He was speaking for himself. Nobody else said what he said. And a flaggable offense on this board is putting words into someone else’s mouth.
So let’s just leave it with the assumption that he was expressing his own idiotic position.
How is that putting words in his mouth?
I took your post to suggest that he was making that statement on behalf of others in this thread.
Maybe I misinterpreted.
No idea how you got there.
It’s a holiday.
I own the confusion here. Sorry.
1 Like
lol, that’s literally what he said, he didn’t say anything about political persuasion. Read it again slowly.
I read just fine thanks, he was blaming it on the identity of the person, not the nature of the cause they donated to. And you know full well who he is talking about and that identity he refers to is political identity.
From the OP:
This is another Soros shadow organization. Soros’ “Open Society Foundations” seriously need to BE INVESTIGATED and take that rich old bastards ability to fund his anti-American causes.
Please show me where I put words in someone’s mouth.
Where did I mention the political persuasion of the donor?
I specifically mentioned CAUSES.
The only “identity” he referred to was “rich people,” and there are plenty of those on both sides. Take off the partisan blinders.
