1

This is trump’s appointed ambassador who also happens to be a major donor to his election campaign.

Looks like Sondland got some excellent advice, and followed it.

1 Like
2

Is this where we are supposed to get over it?

7 Likes
4

Extortion is not a crime!

1 Like
5

I think this where we are supposed to say, so what? Who cares about quid pro quo?

1 Like
6

God forbid Trump tries to win an election without foreign interference.

1 Like
7

Wrong!

8

He must have went Deep State after leaving America and after Trump gave him the position.

9

What part is wrong? Trump’s actions?

10

nytimes reporting of what Sondland testified to the committee…

12

We can read the testimony with our own eyes.

7 Likes
13

How is the Times wrong and what’s your basis for saying they are? And be specific, please.

14

Good.

So where does it say Sondland said there was quid pro quo?

Point out the exact quote please.

15

Or get under it… the bus that is

1 Like
16

You really need someone to point it out to you?

17

Good argument…I’m gonna try that next time I get caught for speeding

18

So you can, but haven’t?

19

I wonder if this is where we start arguing about the definition of words…

20

I can read. So yes, it’s plainly in the story. You’re saying you can’t see what’s plainly in the story?

21

This isnt Hillary or obama so cons dont care about rule of law.

22

Take some time. Read the testimony. If you cannot see it, then yes, you get to keep thinking there was no quid.

1 Like