You are going off gut feeling. You want to call my position that there are zero stats presented either way as willfully dishonest you go for it. Don’t mind the laughter though. I know i know you don’t give a cuss what i laugh at you just know you are right!
the entire world knows i’m right, along with every prosecutor who’s ever served in the circuit. but you go right ahead and pretend to believe it ain’t true. we know, you know, the world knows, it is true.
Right. Present some evidence of your gut feelings or just call them gut feelings. I presented an example. The city of New York. It contains two federal districts neither of which haas any issues prosecuting, forcing plea agreement or convicting dems.
So your accusations are nothing but. But the blustering is glorious.
in nyc they know their politicians are corrupt, and know whatever they do to them (they’d probably like to burn them at the stake), the next one won’t be any different. so they don’t gain or lose anything prosecuting them, its sport.
dc is dc, the politicians they’re prosecuting ain’t theirs, they’re somebody elses and its all about the politics.
Look I’ll be honest the reason why i keep asking for evidence isn’t because i think you are way off, it’s that los Politicians even federal ones usually commit crimes wherein they are prosecuted in their own districts so my point is while you certainly could be right the data is missing.
I understood what you read political operatives aren’t politicians. They are a separate entity. Anyway i gave you my reasons for my position. Your fervent blustering remains irrelevant
A biter feud or not it resulted in prosecution. You can keep rationalizing or say that all you have is assumptions…. But i know you won’t though. So it’s okie.