Some Truths About The 2nd Amendment and Guns

[WuWei]

Good company.

[AZslim]

Yes, but not for a long time. It is kind of beat up. The barrel is pitted some as well. I’m toying with the idea shooting it again, but I think I’ll take it to a gunsmith as the last round I fired, the casing failed to eject and got stuck. I used a brass rod to tap it out. I want them to go through it and test fire it before I do again.

[altair1013]

@WuWei

There is nothing magical about “10 rounds or fewer”. It’s an arbitrary number.

The ten rounds or fewer thing gets their feet in the door. It’s a starting point. Not an ending point. Every liberal knows this.

[WuWei]

Yes indeed.

[Steel-W0LF]

@altair1013

@WuWei

There is nothing magical about “10 rounds or fewer”. It’s an arbitrary number.

The ten rounds or fewer thing gets their feet in the door. It’s a starting point. Not an ending point. Every liberal knows this.

That and the fact that almost every semi auto produced can hold 10 or more rounds.

1911 guys hold your tongues, they will find a way to come after your “weapon of war”.

[WildRose]

In some states they already have due to the (Laughable) High Capacity Magazine… .

[WuWei]

Just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not there.

“Open” vs “Concealed” is a dress code to keep you from getting vapors, not a safety issue.

[Samm]

@WuWei

Just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not there.

“Open” vs “Concealed” is a dress code to keep you from getting vapors, not a safety issue.

Concealed carry is like asymptomatic COVID.

[WuWei]

8 years is a pretty long knee jerk.

But they did anticipate it.

There is no “gun cut” (I assume you mean culture).

[WuWei]

@RPG

The quartering of troops in peoples homes has gone on to mean nothing in the history of America, if it had gone unwritten, no one would notice.

Oh and you might want to do a little research on this one.

[WuWei]

That is the least of the issues with it.

Did you read the rules?

[WuWei]

@RPG

Of course, there’s a lot of things the founding fathers couldn’t anticipate.

What is it you think they didn’t anticipate?

[WuWei]

@RPG

@WuWei

That is the least of the issues with it.

Did you read the rules?

Yes, i did.

Thank you.

[WildRose]

Usurpations of rights is generally what triggers the discussion about protecting them.

[Optrader]

@PurpnGold

@TheRedComet

No, no it is not. Not when it comes to the basic rights of citizens. That context doesn’t change.

Maybe I should say the environment changed. We are not the same society that we were in 1791. The founders could have never predicted the internet, automatic weapons, freed black people, etc.

They made the document with the context/environment they had in 1700s. Sure we could and should amended the document but that is impossible today. Why? Because of another thing they could not have predicted two party rule (or political parties at all)

They could certainly predict the tyranny of an unchecked government and an unarmed population.

[Optrader]

@FloridaYankee

@Steel-W0LF

@WildRose

Many of them have been for example Hawaii’s effective ban on lawful carry was tossed.

I remember hearing that.

I also remember hearing that it was still almost impossible to get a permit there. I didn’t verify it so I could be wrong on that.

You have to prove that you have reason to fear for your safety.

That our government is run by Libs isn’t enough??

[Optrader]

@biggestal99

@WuWei

Because the SCOTUS is not honest.

And with that once again, SCOTUS is neither honest nor dishonest.

They hear cases that interest 4 or more them and contain an important federal question Obviously it doesn’t include second amendment cases. Since they routinely let the cases stand by denying certiorari.

Allan

So I’m assuming if the current SCOTUS overturned Roe V. Wade you’d be ok with that?

[biggestal99]

@Optrader

So I’m assuming if the current SCOTUS overturned Roe V. Wade you’d be ok with that?

That’s the way it is. SCOTUS is the final arbiter.

I will disagree, but SCOTUS doesn’t need approval of the people.

It didn’t in 1973, it doesn’t in 2020 and beyond.

Allan

[WuWei]

Did the SCOTUS rule the 18th Amendment unConstitutional?

[FloridaYankee]

@Optrader

@FloridaYankee

@Steel-W0LF

@WildRose

Many of them have been for example Hawaii’s effective ban on lawful carry was tossed.

I remember hearing that.

I also remember hearing that it was still almost impossible to get a permit there. I didn’t verify it so I could be wrong on that.

You have to prove that you have reason to fear for your safety.

That our government is run by Libs isn’t enough??

Depends on the judge…