WuWei
122
Reloading is an activity, not a problem.
Samm
124
The harm done to children who are subjected to performing in child pornography is demonstrable. By definition, that is not subjective.
Samm
125
Its an inferior firearm that fires an inferior cartridge. That’s the main difference.
1 Like
Samm
126
No it can’t. The SCOTUS clearly said so.
“Stripper clip” to be exact.
Samm
128
You are misreading that sentence. They did not give carte blanch to ban any weapon for any reason.
1 Like
Samm
129
The fee and restrictions are on the location, not the assembly.
Weight, caliber, accuracy. I’ll take an M1A over an AR any day.
Samm
131
We are not talking about body hair grooming.

It was, even the 9th Circuit had to throw it out and forced them to come up with a reasonable permitting process.
Tiny steps in the right direction.
There aren’t unless your “assembly” infringes on the rights of others and/or creates a threat to public safety.
Our rights only exist up to the point at which they infringe on the rights of others.
Full and half moon clips as well.
I agree.
I was just speaking to why anti-gun zealots seem to hate ARs, but ignore superior rifles that don’t have plastic furniture.
AZslim
136
I’ve fired from a clip. I have an M1 Garand.
1 Like
PLING! Watch that thumb. Did you get your Garand through the CMP?
AZslim
138
No, I inherited it. It’s all in one one piece. According to a book I have the serial numbers put it from 1943.
Awesome, do you know the manufacturer? During WWII Garands were made by a dozen or more factories ( like everything else), including the Singer Sewing Machine Corp. The manufacturer should be stamped on the top of the receiver behind the rear sight.
AZslim
140
It is a Springfield Armory one.
1 Like
That’s a keeper. Ok now I’m insanely jealous. Have you had out to the range?
Never mind don’t tell me.
■■■■ me, an M1 Garand bestowed upon thee.