221

Of course not.

I addressed the difference in the national popular vote – in the current election, which was the specific statement I addressed - and it matches the same difference in one single state.

No other state comes close.

Maybe some day, for some other election, some other state will fit that bill. But not today.

And all you’re doing now is reinforcing the fact that what you tried to claim about what I said was abjectly false and fabricated.

222

I’m confused. I thought it was “about the policies”? But yet he wasn’t policymaking?

Are you sure it wasn’t all just about owning the libz?

223

I said it last night … that is genuinely impressive, and surprises me.

224

You are saying without California, the popular vote would be in Trumps favor, correct?

If that is what you are saying, my position is that we can just eliminate Texas, Missouri, South Carolina, Alabama, Oklahoma, Ohio, Indiana too. Without Those states and California, Dems would have the popular vote still.

See how silly that sounds to try to eliminate a state because you don’t like how they contribute to the popular vote?

Of course if you eliminate California from the total… you also lose the 4 million republican votes counted so far.

1 Like
225

And that’s a stupid statement.

Hope that helps.

Here’s a hint: Popular vote doesn’t matter.

226

Oh so you can eliminate California but I can’t eliminate several red states? :rofl:

Thank the EC for continued Republican relevance.

227

I didn’t say anything about eliminating California.

That’s your stupid idea.

Dude, you have a problem with discussing things honestly. That’s been a consistent pattern since you joined the board. This thread is no different.

2 Likes
228

I just heard rush mention the take away we get from the trump presidency. Trump has placed Republicans solidly for the blue collar working class. The left is now deemed the elite social snobs. That is a great win.

1 Like
229

What an accusation! :rofl: tsk tsk

Republicans are unpopular. Period.

The EC helps them stay relevant against the will of the people. ALL PEOPLE (Which includes Californians)

230

Which is hilarious because Trump is an elitist snob :rofl:

231

So was fdr but the take away by the left was he was for them

232

No the electoral college does not. Read up on why its there.
Also if Republicans were not relevant then biden is having a hard time winning for nothing

233

Polls need to join the rest of the media in the respect they receive from the public.

234

The United States does not exist on the same level and purpose as a second grade class, where the majority always wins. It was created by states and the people of those states giving up their independence for a certain set of conditions, one of which was not that the national popular vote is what determines all issues.
Don’t like it, you don’t like the nature of the United States government. Amend it (not likely) or dissolve it and reform a different government of the states willing to join a new Union under different conditions (also unlikely).

1 Like
235

The Trump family I assume?

236

This one thing I won’t miss. Libs will have to find a new boogeyman

237

It does for the house, senate, state, local.

Just not for the one office that is there to represent all people in the US.

Weird right?

238

The Senate is representative of a national vote? With Wyoming having the same number of Senators as California? If anything people who believe in a say for the national majority should be more upset over the Senate than anything else.

239

Have Cons moved on from Hillary?

240

Nope.