Jeffrey Buzz Buzz Bezos , and Microsoft Bill Gates, both are some of the richest
men in the world! Both live in a mainly Liberal ran state(Washington), and yet for some reason their state suffers widely from homelessness, and people addicted to heavy drugs especially things like heroin.
Why donât Jeffrey, and Gates try to help make their states less full of drugs, and help people not to be in poverty as much?
Why is it that states ran heavily by mainly nothing but Socialist Democrat Politicians tend to have the most people living in poverty and living on the streets?
Those darn 1 Percenters!!! and all of their money!
Wait? Why arenât some of the Richest men in the world helping their own state
out more?
It couldnât have anything to do with the fact that theyâre Liberal Democrats, and
since they donate to Liberal Democrat Politicians in Washington, their Politician
friends simply look the other way, and project all of their own states problems on
the rest of America and Republicans, is it? lol.
Naaaaaaaaah. Not Possible. Theyâre Democrat Politicians, and therefore perfect, and automatically know whatâs best for everyone in this country, weather you like it or not!!! lol.
Same argument could be levied at those who vehemently oppose abortion. Why doesnt every anti abortion protestor agree to fund the medical bills of the pregnant woman and adopt the child when its born.
Because its a stupid argument just like the one you are making.
i was looking up some information on this, could you post a link to prove your statement ,
âWhy is it that states ran heavily by mainly nothing but Socialist Democrat Politicians tend to have the most people living in poverty and living on the streets?â
So Jeffrey Bezzos, Isnât one of the Richest people in America?
And he isnât a Democrat Politician donor? lol.
I thought that the far Left-Wing Democrat Politicians were always whining about
the 1percenters in America?
Which doesnât make any sense, when a lot of their donors, and Lobbyists, are companies, are people and companies like Facebook, and Twitter, and Google.
Democrats want people to be poor and hungry since one is less likely to give you trouble if his stomach is growling and empty. Thatâs how the Democrats maintain control and firm grip on people while they keep saying they âcareâ.
Thatâs the reason they keep open borders so more and more of vulnerable people will pile up all over the USA.
They alienate their own base, like the minority votes. They automatically expect the majority of Black, Hispanic and women to vote for them, and take their vote for granite.
That is one of their weaknesses though. Theyâre willing to sell out anybody, and alienate their own base to get the illegal and refugee vote.
They figure, it doesnât matter who they alienate, just as long as they can keep flooding the country with enough illegals to the point where no other category of groups of people matter.
Because there will be so many tens of millions if not hundreds of millions of illegals that have flooded in this country over the past 40+ years, that all the Democrat Politicians will need is the majority of their votes. Especially since theyâre flooding states that use to be Conservative with illegals. Such as Arizona, and Texas especially. Those states continue to get bluer and bluer over the years. If Texas starts going to the Democrat Politicians, then Conservative will completely die out. All it will ultimately take is a matter of time.
Youâve been manipulated by liberal propaganda once again. You have to take in cost of living as part of the equation. When you do that Cal and NY have the most poorâŚ
How about the LA times⌠Why didnât you take 5 seconds to google it?
" Guess which state has the highest poverty rate in the country? Not Mississippi, New Mexico, or West Virginia, but California, where nearly one out of five residents is poor. Thatâs according to the Census Bureauâs Supplemental Poverty Measure, which factors in the cost of housing, food, utilities and clothing, and which includes noncash government assistance as a form of income."
First of all thanks for the article. It was interesting and made me learn more sbout the SPM.
So if we use the SPM how do you account for red states like MS, GA and KY having high rates of poverty on a similar level to CA?
Could it be that âsocialismâ has nothing to do with it but the causes of poverty are deeper and more complex than throwing out glib single word phrasing?
Poverty will always exist in some form but on my travels through the US I have seen levels of poverty that need to be eradicated but it will never be tackled until Americans come together and acknowledge there is a problem that goes much further than its all down to personal choices