It will end 6 to 3 in the North Carolina case and 6 to 2 in the Harvard case, though the Harvard case may end up being decided as a vacate and remand without a formal opinion.
All the HR training I ever took made it clear that Affirmative Action is NOT quotas. True AA means that when deciding to fill a slot from among multiple candidates, race only becomes a factor if all other criteria are equal. In essence, race becomes a tie breaker, and even then, it comes into play only if/when the existing body of (employees/students/recipients) is not representative of the population at large.
Maybe the SCOTUS ruling would reinforce the original intentions and structure of AA.
Individuals are hired for their abilities, not to represent religions, races etc. No person who has a job in a particular field who has my same skin color represents me. Now if when everything is equal, history shows one race always selected at a company, that may be evidence of discrimination.
Or so it should be.
All other criteria being equal, flip a coin. Discrimination by big companies in hiring based on race was made illegal in the 1960s. It is not to be used as a criteria.