461

Both are, you just reject one because it doesn’t suit your own world view.

462

No. Again. You’re genome comment in the context of card shuffling yet again shows you have NO IDEA what you are talking about, and are simply here to promote religious propaganda

463

All people “came” from monkeys. Who’s “they”?

464

Then show it, quit just flapping off at the mouth with vacuous statements of “fact” without anything to support them.

465

What theory does that prove? You are providing descriptions of natural phenomena.

466

I already posted a link. You probably ignores it or missed it being so quick to want to be right. The notion that abiogenesis is mathematically impossible because the smallest known genome is 475 characters is laughable on many levels

467

Tou are simply providing observations of natural phenomena (i.e. facts). Pro tip: facts and theories are two completely different things. Facts are simply observed natural phenomena. Theories are models that explain natural phenomena that have a significant level of supporting evidence (eg predictive power, not being falsified by new facts, etc).

Theories aren’t proven.

1 Like
468

The existence of Atoms was mere theory at the end of the 19th, early 20th century.

469

You threw up a link that proves nothing.

Again you have a reading problem. I never said it isn’t possible, I said that ID is much more mathematically probably and it is by at least a hundred orders of magnitude.

470

Good lord. We were talking about irreducible complexity of the eye.

Now you want to go off on a tangent to abiogenesis and pretend like that’s somehow fundamental to the topic.

You’re a complete hack.

1 Like
471

You can’t even begin to prove this.

472

And you have nothing else to offer.

473

Really?

Please show your math.

474

I countered your every argument. When you ran out of arguments, you started reaching for whatever you could grasp for.

It’s pathetic.

1 Like
475

You push single payer…

476

I’m as liberal as they come. I don’t push single payer.

477

Yes I can.

A pretty decent read on the subject here.

An interesting video on the subject.

478

You haven’t countered anything. You keep tossing out crap that doesn’t prove anything.

479

Really? Says the guy who thinks it’s more likely to develop nearly the same exact gene independently than to be genetically related.

And I’m the one tossing out crap.

The only thing you’ve done is stick your fingers in your ears and whine about “proof”.

480

Quote the post in which I said it is more likely.