So why haven't the arbiters of racism denounced Darwin?

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Godinez

Darwin was a 19th century man.

so were southern slavers.

[Morgan]

@BornAgainChristian

@Scratch

Umm…Maybe because the conditions in the area that is now China were better and easier to survive in. Hence the larger population…Not really hard to figure out…

Confirming Darwin’s racism, is his own writings. And his theory of origins is cited often by Progressives when advocating Eugenics (racial cleansing via abortions) of blacks.

Its overwhelming and incontrovertible, Darwin’s theory is racist. There is no reason to say Blacks evolved from monkeys greater than Chinese evolving from monkeys or any other racial group. None whatsover.

Therefore, all those in higher education teaching racism, regardless of tenure, needs to be fired.

The Roseanne rule applied to those racist professors who fully know what they are doing.

That is confirmed when they immediately make the “ape-black” connection decrying the racism in others.

They are projecting their own racism and must go. They should be driven out of our education system. We need it purged of racist Darwinism.

Hoo boy. I think you perhaps misunderstood the ideas in evolutionary biology about human evolution beginning in Africa and then decided to layer a whole lot of stupid on top of that misunderstanding.

[BornAgainChristian]

@FloridaYankee

Darwin was absolutely a racist and it doesn’t take innuendo to prove it, just use his own words.

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes . . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.

Thank you. That is an overwhelming mas of irrefutable evidence Darwin and his fellow progressives are racists:

man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.

[mobulis]

@BornAgainChristian

@FloridaYankee

Darwin was absolutely a racist and it doesn’t take innuendo to prove it, just use his own words.

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes . . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.

Thank you. That is an overwhelming mas of irrefutable evidence Darwin and his fellow progressives are racists:

man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.

So?..

[WildRose]

This is one of your more ridiculous threads.

“Survival of the Fittest” is not racist.

That the most highly successful species become dominant is not racist.

Merit based immigration is not racist.

While we all may be equal in the eyes of God and under the law (supposedly) not all people are equal but race has little to do with it.

[BornAgainChristian]

@BornAgainChristian

The left is proficient discovering racism everywhere. Hoop earrings, Dr. Sues, Star Trek, merit based immigration, even flight experience when applying to be an air traffic controller, well done hamburgers. The list is endless.
The left are the preeminent arbiters of racism. They know it when they see it, or so they claim.

So why haven’t the arbiters of racism denounced Darwin?
But why don’t they see racism in Darwin’s theory of Evolution? China had monkeys and twice the population as Africa in 1859. Clearly they’ve been around making babies longer than Africans. So why didn’t Darwin say Evolution began in China?

In 1859 Charles Darwin first proposed Evolution to explain the origin of the species

in 1859 China’s population was 380,4 million
In 1859 Africa’s population was about 120 million

Therefore, all other factors being equal, China’s population has been making babies longer than Africa.

China has monkeys just like Africa:

Primates. In addition to the world’s largest population of ■■■■ sapiens, China is also home to a dozen other primate species including gibbons, macaques, leaf monkeys, gray langurs, snub-nosed monkeys and lorises.-Wildlife of China - Wikipedia

Clearly, Darwin is racist. His theory is racist. So why haven’t the arbiters of racism denounced Darwin?

The left could, with a bold direct stroke, strike at the foundation of racism.

Deny the “ape black” connection.

Yet they do not. Why?

[WildRose]

Seriously BAC, you should just quit.

[BornAgainChristian]

@WildRose

Seriously BAC, you should just quit.

Seriously, even former evolutionists realize the complexity of DNA requires a “programmer.”

Every entity is a discrete program. Programs don’t evolve from slime.

[MidwestIndy]

No way. It’s much easier to believe that in the beginning there was only adam and eve, and all of us are really just incestuous offspring.

[BornAgainChristian]

@MidwestIndy

No way. It’s much easier to believe that in the beginning there was only adam and eve, and all of us are really just incestuous offspring.

Even if evolved from apes, the same applies therefore you have proved nothing.

[MidwestIndy]

No not really, you see there was far more than two apes that could have evolved at the same time, different continents, different strains, etc.

Let me put it another way. Two white people have a child, does that child come out black? How many generations of inbreeding would it take to produce a completely different race?

[BornAgainChristian]

@FloridaYankee

Virtually nobody is advocating eugenics today, what a crock and those that are are mostly on the right in the white supremacist movement.

But the racist “ape black” connection persists, and THAT is the foundation of racism. Reject that, and discrimination against blacks goes away.

Raëlism

[BornAgainChristian]

@FloridaYankee

Virtually nobody is advocating eugenics today, what a crock and those that are are mostly on the right in the white supremacist movement.

I copy pasted the wrong link:

Raëlism

Candace Owens brings it all to modern day.

[BornAgainChristian]

Candace Owens

Can’t believe what Google did to prevent my posting Candice Owen’s link.

Incredible.

[Blackwolf]

You’ve outdone yourself with this thread, Alfie.

And that’s saying something.

[calirepub]

@Borgia_dude_dude

Next he will tell us about moon dust disproving evolution.

Honest to god; when I was a kid, my grandfather told me how the amount of moon dust proved the earth was too young for evolution to be real.

[FloridaYankee]

I’m sure that had he learned that the different “races” are not on a different evolutionary time scale he would have modified his views. Based on the evidence. He was wrong about some things, as are we all at times.

[FloridaYankee]

Reject something that doesn’t even exist?

And what does Raelism (which I"ve never even heard of) have to do with ANYTHING?

[Godinez]

Precisely. Judging people from the 19th century for their attitudes toward race with 21st century values is wrong.

[WuWei]

So was Robert E. Lee.