No it’s not. It makes them legal under existing laws. Otherwise, you would simply be granting them amnesty. Once you do that, then you would have to grant everyone amnesty.
You would be granting them amnesty if they don’t leave first. You can’t just single out a section of the illegal population for amnesty.
Today anyone who self-deports can come back legally. Yes, with a letter some can come back quicker. But that is always the case, when a need arises for foreign workers.
In another thread you were touting how important it is to follow the law.
If I were president, I would be endorsing some sort of process to legalize/document those who are undocumented but have assimilated into jobs and neighborhoods, and have not committed any other crimes.
I wouldn’t push for it, though, until the immigration process is solidified and cleaned up. Otherwise the undocumented-to-documented process just becomes a perpetual escalator.
But maybe set some “from this day forward” as a cutoff date. I don’t care if it gets labeled as amnesty. If it creates a once-and-for-all event, I’d endorse it.
I suppose the problem is these hotels and farms are hiring illegals and now want to keep them when the gig is up. But they don’t want the expense of the H2B visa, which is very pricey for the business. If the immigrant broke the law so did the business that hired them. If the immigrant has to exit and come back the business should also face consequences of violating US law by hiring them.
If this is a way for businesses to skirt H2B visa costs, which are considerable, I don’t see how this happens. Plus, the immigrant would be forced to work for their sponsor, if they quit they lose their right to work here. This is tantamount to indentured servitude and human trafficking. All kinds of abuse could happen in this sort of situation, because the business holds all the power over the worker.
Deporting illegals doesn’t mean we end immigration. If there are certain areas that need more workers, bring those people in…legally and vetted.
That is consistent with Trumps proposed immigration bill in his first term where he wanted chain migration to be replaced with immigration based on economic needs.
Should people who had been here illegally get a preference? I don’t like that part. But I am fine with not holding it against them for future immigration if they left of their own volition.