Simple Questions for the Gun Control Crowd

[Samm]

@Auto129

@WuWei

Aren’t you really wanting to feed gun owners “into the system”?

The system has no way to track gun owners. It just looks for gun purchases. Thats a behavior that can be profiled in context with everything else.

Excuse me?

[Samm]

@Auto129

I’m trying to build a profile for observation. Their behaviors are often similar. It’s silly to ignore the known patterns now that it’s possible to keep track of those patterns with technology.

May I suggest implanting a microchip at birth so the government can keep track of us when we go astray?

[Samm]

@Auto129

@WuWei

This makes no sense.

Gun purchases is indeed a “behavior”. It is not an illegal “behavior”.

Behaviors don’t have to be illegal to be noted. It’s still useful information for building profiles based on known patterns.

“Brave New World”

[Samm]

@Auto129

@WuWei

No crime has been committed.

Law enforcement can still be made aware of public behavior.

“Minority Report”

“1984”

You’re hitting them all. What’s next, “Animal Farm”?

[Samm]

@thinkingman

@travisg

Do you support Joe Biden wanting to ban some handguns?

i’d like some big brain leftist describe to me how this is not contrary to “shall not be infringed”

C’mon man. As long as you have access to a flint lock muzzle-loaded musket, your rights have not been infringed.

[Samm]

@PurpnGold

Your gun is purpose built to kill. It is why they exist.

My ballot requires a registry, your guns can too.

The Constitution says one man one vote. Registration of voters is the only way to ensure that. On the other hand, the Constitution does not say one man one gun, therefore, there is no reason to register gun owners or their guns … unless you plan to confiscate them.

[Samm]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

Chavez was elected. So was Putin.

Well I’m glad I didn’t vote for them.

If I throw my ballot at someone, what is the likelihood of survival?

Why do you think that matters?

[Samm]

@GWH

But .22 caliber is okay. Get your kid an AR-15. That’s what they shoot.

[rp5x5]

@Samm

@Auto129

@WuWei

No crime has been committed.

Law enforcement can still be made aware of public behavior.

“Minority Report”

“1984”

You’re hitting them all. What’s next, “Animal Farm”?

Jurassic Park—that’s allegorical.

[DisturbedGuy]

@Samm

@Auto129

I’m trying to build a profile for observation. Their behaviors are often similar. It’s silly to ignore the known patterns now that it’s possible to keep track of those patterns with technology.

May I suggest implanting a microchip at birth so the government can keep track of us when we go astray?

They already did. You carry your personal tracker with you everywhere you go.

[Smyrna]

My view is simple; until our government gets this violence, destruction of personal property, murders and illegal immigration under control…they’ve PROVEN they are too incompetent to protect me from the danger my weapon will…which is one reason why the 2nd was written.

[Auto129]

Sounds like a lot of extra work when you could just read their online behavior.

Was it possible to see the synagogue shooter coming just going on things he put out into the digital world? Did he go in there without doing reconnaissance on the address? If google (or whatever) had context for that search, maybe they could have helped.

The killers themselves self-document most of their preparations. There’s nothing wrong with putting all that information together.

[tnt]

@WuWei

Your registry is.

Why is a voting registry constitutional, but a gun registry not?

[WuWei]

Who said a voting registry is Constitutional?

[EternalVigilance]

@tnt

Why is a voting registry constitutional, but a gun registry not?

Because guns are inanimate objects that don’t vote.

[PurpnGold]

@EternalVigilance

@tnt

Why is a voting registry constitutional, but a gun registry not?

Because guns are inanimate objects that don’t vote.

And votes are imaginary objects than don’t kill

[zantax]

@PurpnGold

@EternalVigilance

@tnt

Why is a voting registry constitutional, but a gun registry not?

Because guns are inanimate objects that don’t vote.

And votes are imaginary objects than don’t kill

Lol, votes don’t kill, good one.

[WuWei]

@tnt

Why is a voting registry constitutional, but a gun registry not?

What do you feel a 4473 is?

[Samm]

@DisturbedGuy

@Samm

@Auto129

I’m trying to build a profile for observation. Their behaviors are often similar. It’s silly to ignore the known patterns now that it’s possible to keep track of those patterns with technology.

May I suggest implanting a microchip at birth so the government can keep track of us when we go astray?

They already did. You carry your personal tracker with you everywhere you go.

No I don’t.

And you greatly exaggerate the ability of big brother to track your phone. Perhaps you watch too many TV crime dramas.

[Samm]

@Auto129

Sounds like a lot of extra work when you could just read their online behavior.

Was it possible to see the synagogue shooter coming just going on things he put out into the digital world? Did he go in there without doing reconnaissance on the address? If google (or whatever) had context for that search, maybe they could have helped.

The killers themselves self-document most of their preparations. There’s nothing wrong with putting all that information together.

Who has time to read all that garbage? The micro-computer in your skull can do it all.