Simple answer to an obvious question

[westaussie]

Innocence and due process is exactly what is being investigated and following the rules that the Republicans instituted.

[bootz]

what verbatim evidence do we have?

the issue is not defending trump it is charging trump.

is there direct evidence to charge trump with? if so post it please

[bootz]

evidence?

[bootz]

please provide a copy of Republican rules you reference.

[westaussie]

Not my responsibility to investigate Trump.

[bootz]

you made statements, but you cannot provide evidence.

[westaussie]

They would be the rules outlining the impeachment process. I am sure your local rep would be able to furnish you with a copy.

[westaussie]

That is quite a remarkable comment. Obvious, but remarkable. I am not party to the impeachment process.

[bootz]

yet you make statements as if you have evidence which you do not have.

[biggestal99]

@bootz

if someone says there is a quid pro quo and the transcript says there was not, was there a quid pro quo?

do me a favor.

What does that suggest to you.

You wash my hands I will wash yours.

Quid pro quo.

No matter how you spin it, it comes back the same

Quid pro quo.

Allan

[bootz]

evidence Allan, where is the evidence?

[biggestal99]

@bootz

evidence Allan, where is the evidence

The president saying “do me a favor”

Or don’t you believe the memo of the call…

Allan

[biggestal99]

@bootz

evidence Allan, where is the evidence

His chief of staff who refused to testify today.

What is he hiding?

Allan

[bootz]

what is wrong with asking for a favor? it happens everyday.

This is the one thing i cannot figure out.

Biden did nothing wrong. nothing at all. so how could an investigation that proved him innocent hurt him?

Also when Obama investigated trump and Hillary etc accused him of collusion as well as getting the dossier with the help of Ukraine. was there anything wrong with that?

if not, then there is nothing wrong with what Trump is accused of doing.

Biden did nothing wrong so no harm no foul.

[Kevhead]

@biggestal99

His chief of staff who refused to testify today.

What is he hiding?

Allan

Because bolten is gonna prove him a liar i imagine

[Phaedrus]

@bootz

what is wrong with asking for a favor? it happens everyday.

Yep. In small businesses every day:

"Nice little setup you got here. We’re here to offer you an insurance policy so that nuttin’ bad happens to it.

We’d like you to do us a favor, though."

[DMK]

@bootz

If a white cop shoots a minority after the victim fires at him, did the white cop shoot the minority?

If a cop shoots someone that fires at him is the shooting justified?

When did someone who shoots at a cop become a victim regardless of the level of melatonin they sport?

@bootz

If a cop shoots an unarmed man and then plants a gun near the victim, did the victim have a gun?

Meh? If someone is unarmed then they are unarmed. If a cop plants a gun the decedent still didn’t have a gun.

@bootz

If a cop gets shot at, and fires back, and hits a person. Did the cop shoot the shooter?

IDK. Did they?

[quote=“bootz, post:1, topic:221565”]

@bootz

if someone calls the cops and says they heard gun shots, does it mean that someone got shot?

Nope. Not until you find a body and can trace ballistics to a shooter.

@bootz

if someone says there is a quid pro quo and the transcript says there was not, was there a quid pro quo?

If you are a democrat on the impeach bandwagon, then of course there is quid pro quo. Just like we are all going to die in ten years because Gore fell flat on his face and now Greta and AOC have taken up where Gore failed.

Your questions remind me of the game that conditions you to answer “yes” to so many things until you get to one that you would answer no to.

Is a red light red?

Does a green light mean go?

Does a stop sign mean stop?

Should Trump be impeached?

Seriously?

[westaussie]

Your interpretation that flies in the face of the impeachment inquiry that is currently in progress.

[Tommy-Englander]

It seems to many people this is just about one phone call,I suggest further reading

[Toll_Collector]

@bootz

If a white cop shoots a minority after the victim fires at him, did the white cop shoot the minority?

If a cop shoots an unarmed man and then plants a gun near the victim, did the victim have a gun?

If a cop gets shot at, and fires back, and hits a person. Did the cop shoot the shooter?

If someone gets shot and a cop shows up, did the cop do the shooting?

if someone calls the cops and says they heard gun shots, does it mean that someone got shot?

if someone says there is a quid pro quo and the transcript says there was not, was there a quid pro quo?

#1. You just asked if the cop shot the minority after stating that he did, the answer is of course YES.

#2. YES! You clearly state the victim has a gun.

#3. NO. Just the person in between him and the shooter.

#4. No.

#5. No. But someone will once the cop gets there.

#6. YES. Never trust a transcript. They are notorious liars.