Actually biden won 51% of the vote and 57% or the electors.
Allan
1 Like
The electoral college was built into our Republic to prevent the tyranny of the majority
1 Like
Now we have the tyranny of the minority
2 Likes
You make it sound like campaign stops in a state is a good thing for that state.
Auto129
408
Now that most of the electoral college results are cemented, have any opinions changed?
By the end of election week, a candidate had obtained a clear majority of votes cast by American citizens. In a popular vote system, that would have been the end of it.
What followed, instead, were several procedural crises. An election that would otherwise be done and dusted, now hinged on handfuls of political elite litigating ways to deprive their subjects of a voice.
This whole affair, if successful, would have been a textbook example of tyranny. The electoral college provided all the leverage necessary for a tiny cabal to overturn an election. This system hinges on nothing but the grace of the elite.
Nah I went as it has went for 200 years.
The electors who were elected by popular vote. And Voted for the candidate who received the most votes.
Allan
Name me one nation that elects their leaders via direct election.
Take your time, I can wait.
A lot of countries in South American directly elect their nations leaders
Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, etcâŚ
Allan
zantax
412
Yeah, we should emulate them, itâs worked out so well for them.
1 Like
The question was asked and answeredâŚ
Also Austria elects directly.
Allan
I have a different spin on what has happened in the weeks after the election.
There have be court case after court case that visibly, laughably failed to show that the election was a fraud. The claims of the election fraud crowd were laid out (as opposed to the âyou know what weâre talking about claimsâ we often see on this forum) and shown to be laughably inadequate. The whole legal process has shown that the result of the election is valid.
The whole process could have been⌠but it wasnât. Instead the process did its job, 1) got specific claims into the public sphere and 2) showed those claims for what they are.
i.e. the system worked, that is not evidence that the system should be changed.
In other words, no country you would want to emulate elects leaders directly.
And that is my point.
DougBH
416
The all or nothing allocation of a states electors works to the detriment of large states with lopsided liberal majorities in their votes, at the current time.
The rest of the arguments are used to justify or attack that effect.
The rest of the reasoning is just support for ones side.
The other relevant thing is that small states who feel they benefit politically from the EC are not going to give it upâŚand that is necessary in order to change the rule.
It is not going to happen.
Austria has direct elections also.
Whatâs wrong with that country?
Allan
WuWei
418
The whole affair was the popular vote.
Guvnah
419
If the EC should be done away with, it should only happen via Constitutional Amendment.
1 Like
tnt
420
I am getting tired of every election hinging upon how a half a dozen states vote.
And my vote hasnât mattered one bit since I went to school in Ohio.