Jezcoe
163
You can make a decision to murder or not murder someone over an inanimate object.
I personally don’t think that murder should happen.
Samm
164
I never mentioned what you do or do not own. What I said is that it’s clear that you have never had properly of great value stolen from you. Particularly property that is taken over by strangers who occupy it as their own with impunity.
Murder is unjustified killing. If they are brazen enough to break into my locked storage building and take my ATV and I catch them in the act and they don’t surrender when I tell them to stop, what happens next is entirely on them.
3 Likes
Samm
166
That’s your prerogative. But it gives you no right to judge others who don’t think like you.
1 Like
Jezcoe
167
You have no idea what I have or have not done or have had done to me.
Just because I don’t think that murder is warranted doesn’t mean that it hasn’t happened.
I just don’t see any material object that is worthy of killing someone over
Its kind of wild that that is a strange position to take.
Jezcoe
168
Well… we are talking about murdering someone.
So……
Some people are pretty protective of their stuff, peace, and sense of safety.
Thieves should know that and refrain from stealing from certain people.
1 Like
Jezcoe
170
Nah… you still have the choice.
No one is making you murder someone over an ATV.
Samm
171
That still does not answer the question that I asked.
Deliberate ignorance is deplorable.
1 Like
Not all of us are egalitarians who think all life is sacred.
Frankly, human life is pretty cheap to be honest. Especially when people bring their own demise on theirselves.
1 Like
Jezcoe
173
That is also a choice that is made.
So I should let theme leave with it and do nothing?
Because the cops around here are pretty useless. They take forever and they don’t try very hard to get property back in the first place.
Samm
175
I agree with you. No one should kill another person without justification.
1 Like
Jezcoe
176
You asked what gives BLM the right.
Which is very funny considering that the Federal government owns the property and Bundy does not.
He is a squatter. He is using land that he does not own for his own benefit and profit.
Samm
177
You’re kind of babbling now. Have you got a point?
Way I look at it is they violated my right to property and my right to feel safe at my own place.
1 Like
Samm
179
Looks like you don’t know the definition of murder either.
3 Likes
Jezcoe
180
If you think that killing someone over an ATV is rational and necessary that is on you.
ATV’s are replaceable.
The act of killing someone over it isn’t.
Jezcoe
181
What if they stole a $20 bill.
Worth killing them?
Unless they’re gonna buy me another 5,000 dollar ATV I don’t think it’s very replaceable. I have a kid now. I can’t afford to blow that kind of money anymore like I used to. I worked and saved for years for it.