Should I Read the mueller Report? Or Other Recent Documents?

ohknow35 · 2019-10-01T08:52:30.940Z

Plasmaball:

They have an audio book…just saying…

This might sound weird, but I’ve never used an audio book.

I prefer to hold a book in my hands.

Though I have read several e-books, so not a problem.

^*

Plasmaball · 2019-10-01T09:26:42.492Z

No I get that…I’m that way with my dragon lance books and to a lesser extent comics.

The feel…the smell…just feels better.

This is different because it’s kinda mundane

biggestal99 · 2019-10-01T10:36:29.671Z

ohknow35:

I admit, I made up my mind very early about the whole “russia collusion hoax

Nah. You had an open mind.
I will give you credit. You heard both sides of the story. Read the meuller report as I did and came to the conclusion that collusion could not be proven as Mueller did.

Otherwise a bias might show though.

Allan (giving credit for an open mind on hannity since 2002)

biggestal99 · 2019-10-01T10:40:11.129Z

ohknow35:

I don’t know… I mean, I haven’t read the trump-zelensky TRANSCRIPT, or the “whistleblower” report and I seem to be doing pretty well on my own

Not really as you have to arm yourself with facts in order to have a rational debate.

If you just spout an opinion about something without the ability to back it up, it comes out as irrational. And certain people, well let’s just say they have certain amount of fun with your baseless opinions.

Allan

ohknow35 · 2019-10-01T10:41:26.635Z

biggestal99:

Not really as you have to arm yourself with facts in order to have a rational debate.

If you just spout an opinion about something without the ability to back it up, it comes out as irrational. And certain people, well let’s just say they have certain amount of fun with your baseless opinions.

Allan

I’d say I’m pretty well armed. Nukular even.

But as always, ORANGE MAN BAD!!

^*

biggestal99 · 2019-10-01T10:42:40.994Z

ohknow35:

I’d say I’m pretty well armed. Nukular even.

^*

Well my opinion is that you are not. Brilliant minds sometimes disagree.

Allan

Candyman · 2019-10-01T12:43:45.082Z

ohknow35:

I’ll tell you, I’ve been reading so much lately. This got me thinking…

I’ve never read the mueller report. I mean some people are saying I should. You see it all the time on these boards. “Read the report.” “Read the report.” “Read the report.”

I admit, I made up my mind very early about the whole “russia collusion hoax”. Some may remember on the other board, I was one of the very first people shooting down this nonsense, posting references to The Crucible saying things like, “Goody (so-and-so) saw trump talking to a russian down by the river.”

I didn’t believe what they were peddling and I was right all along. No collusion!

I also had some bias against team mueller because of how long they were dragging this ■■■■ out. I may have been a little hard on bobby.

Should I go back and read it now??

^*

No. Your ignorance has always been one of your more charming qualities.

ohknow35 · 2019-10-01T12:44:50.037Z

Candyman:

No. Your ignorance has always been one of your more charming qualities.

Okay.

^*

acsirip · 2019-10-01T13:05:46.851Z

Too many words. Dont ready brah, you already know the truth.

Weedhopper · 2019-10-01T17:17:01.306Z

No, it’s a wast of time and full of second hand information from Crowdstrike just like the whistle blower hoax now.

Intel Vets debunks the Crowdstrike garbage.

consortiumnews.com – 24 Jul 17

Intel Vets Challenge 'Russia Hack' Evidence

In a memo to President Trump, a group of former U.S. intelligence officers, including NSA specialists, cite new forensic studies to challenge the claim of the key Jan. 6 “assessment” that Russia “hacked” Democratic emails last year. MEMORANDUM...

Weedhopper · 2019-10-01T17:19:14.938Z

So what should we call those ignoring the current investigations into Obama’s spygate, fisa abuse, uranium one and on and on?

What?

Weedhopper · 2019-10-01T17:21:28.268Z

acsirip:

Too many words. Dont ready brah, you already know the truth.

How do we know the truth when the investigations aren’t over?

Please share.

DougBH · 2019-10-01T17:23:45.386Z

Are you serious? You see some around here claiming that this report is damaging to Trump even though it explicitly concludes that there was insufficient evidence of cooperation between Russia and the Trump campaign.
Of course you should read it. Every accusation that was made and why, at the end, the conclusion was insufficient reason for cooperation.
Indeed, that report alone is justification for investigating the origins of the Russian collusion investigations. Why did we spend two and a half years and millions of dollars investigating nothing?

W_and_C · 2019-10-01T17:23:55.597Z

Well it probably wouldn’t hurt to find another way to occupy your time besides pressing this button on here every five minutes

Weedhopper · 2019-10-01T17:23:57.428Z

That’s why we are waiting for those investigations into the Obama scandals to end!

Not sure why you’re ignoring them, did fake news give you false hope keeping these investigations from you?

ohknow35 · 2019-10-01T17:25:30.936Z

Weedhopper:

No, it’s a wast of time and full of second hand information from Crowdstrike just like the whistle blower hoax now.

Intel Vets debunks the Crowdstrike garbage.

Consortiumnews – 24 Jul 17

Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

In a memo to President Trump, a group of former U.S. intelligence officers, including NSA specialists, cite new forensic studies to challenge the claim of the key Jan. 6 “assessment” that Russia “hacked” Democratic emails last year. MEMORANDUM…

Eh… I’ll probably get around to it.

I’ve got a new stephen king to get to first.

^*

DougBH · 2019-10-01T17:26:57.017Z

Ummm…you need to read those too. Are you serious?

ohknow35 · 2019-10-01T17:28:09.781Z

DougBH:

Are you serious? You see some around here claiming that this report is damaging to Trump even though it explicitly concludes that there was insufficient evidence of cooperation between Russia and the Trump campaign.
Of course you should read it. Every accusation that was made and why, at the end, the conclusion was insufficient reason for cooperation.
Indeed, that report alone is justification for investigating the origins of the Russian collusion investigations. Why did we spend two and a half years and millions of dollars investigating nothing?

That’s what I feel like I’ve been missing.

Now that Pompeo and Barr are looking into it.

It just never seemed necessary. I knew there was no collusion all along.

^*

Weedhopper · 2019-10-01T17:35:42.933Z

I’ll brake it down for you.

They proved it was an inside job by the size of the documents and the time it took to downloaded was impossible to be downloaded over the internet.

Kelby · 2019-10-01T17:40:47.188Z

ohknow35:

Weedhopper:

No, it’s a wast of time and full of second hand information from Crowdstrike just like the whistle blower hoax now.

Intel Vets debunks the Crowdstrike garbage.

Consortiumnews – 24 Jul 17

Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

In a memo to President Trump, a group of former U.S. intelligence officers, including NSA specialists, cite new forensic studies to challenge the claim of the key Jan. 6 “assessment” that Russia “hacked” Democratic emails last year. MEMORANDUM…

Eh… I’ll probably get around to it.

I’ve got a new stephen king to get to first.

^*

I’m a big fan, too.

It’s good you can separate the author from his politics.

https://twitter.com/StephenKing/status/953380106587770881

There are many more.