Milley doesn’t need the President permission to talk to someone on the phone.

what confidential information did Milley share?

Wonder if Milley will be Chief of Staff if Trump wins in 2024.

Okay, I will take that response as “no, there no similar action to point to”.

Milley is certainly able to leak confidential information, but he could be prosecuted for the leaks.

1 Like

I think Trump would immediately fire Milley.

He made a verbal contract to share classified operational information.

1 Like

no he said China would be informed if conflict were to break out.
which is standard practice for the U.S Military to tell people before hand unless directed otherwise.

like when U.S Military warned Russia that they would be bombing their military base in Syria.

What confidential information was leaked?

russia isn’t going to attack ukraine. oops.

What information was not leaked. Biden told China, China told Russia. Biden tells the press to look like he knows what he is doing. But, he does not.

Hey I heard Bullwinkle the Fiberal Bedwetter of Canada, Drama Queen of the French speaking province was told off at an meeting overseas. How bout that.

Tucker Carlson is a great guy and hosts an interesting show. I take him over Bullwinkle the Fiberal Bedwetter of the French speaking province and day. I like Tucker and he is a friend of our gracious host. Please clean up your opinionated comments that are apparently based on some very misguided notions and narratives of fiberal liberals and rinos.

Very good questions, Bill. I would like to know who is behind the curtain. +10

Oh, the sec def… intersesting…

We already have, if any country did to us what we have done to Russia we would definitely be calling it an attack.

1 Like

+10. My daily does of reality with brunch. Good post.

You completely distorted facts. Your narrative writers need some R&R. They are now into the absurd.

And every other general or high ranking officer that ever pushed the woke BS IMO.

No. Most of our chemical weapon stockpile has been dismantled.

We maintain nuclear weapons as our WMD deterrence and weapons of choice. The Russians keep both options available.

I disagree. US forces have not engaged Russian forces anywhere in the world.

It’s great power proxy politics.

We didn’t attack the USSR or China over their support for the NVA and the Viet Cong. Nor did the Soviets attack us over our bankrolling the Mujahideen in Afghanistan.

The Russians aren’t stupid. They’ve played this game many times before. Just like we have.

If Putin wants to go insane and claim we are attacking them directly and threaten us with his nuclear arsenal, we calmly reply that we have just as many warheads as they do and point out that we have the capability to turn everything west of the Urals into glass.

If we go, they go down with us. It’s that simple. And the Russians understand that.

Now I will say that the Russians have a red line. And although that red line cannot be quantified, it’s safe to assume that if we start supplying Ukraine with either aircraft or armored vehicles, that line is crossed.

Small arms shipments have always been acceptable between great powers in proxy conflicts. And the Russians are better at that game than anyone else about the risks and advantages of overlooking things to keep the war from expanding.

1 Like