SF soldier submits to waterboarding to prove a point

WildRose · 2018-05-16T08:00:13.100Z

No you haven’t, you haven’t provided anything that shows they created such an environment that allowed for Abu Ghraib to happen.

kingarthur65 · 2018-05-16T08:15:07.235Z

I, once again, refer you to wikipedia. If you don’t like what’s there, go ahead and try to change it.

WildRose · 2018-05-16T08:45:05.117Z

Nothing in the article shows that the Administration created the conditions that led to Abu Ghraib.

Illegal_Alien · 2018-05-16T14:03:28.015Z

AZslim:

Police brutality is a crime. I think we agree racism is wrong. These are legitimate things that should be guarded against. Torture is another wrong that we should not legitimize.

A few fringe liberals might want all guns banned bit most do not. I think you would agree that banning all guns is an example of giving the government too much power in the pursuit of security. It seems to me that allowing the government torture falls into the same category…why would you condone this?

Did i every say I condone Torture? your Question was a Specific question I answered it.
And it is Not a FEW FRINGE LIBERALS who want to ban all firearms.
Because the Banning of the "Light Firearms or should i say “Assault Rifles” makes no logical sense when the majority of crime and deaths are used with Handguns.
I have heard plenty of Main Stream Democrat and Liberals talk about banning all Firearms.

AZslim · 2018-05-17T00:45:04.387Z

Name a few mainstream Democratic politicians who want to ban ALL firearms?

WuWei · 2018-05-17T00:45:59.186Z

Feinstein.

WuWei · 2018-05-17T00:51:21.086Z

Name one time gun control advocates ever stopped of their own accord.

It’s obvious what the script is. Ban ARs because they’re weapons of war and “nobody really needs one.”

Then, “We banned those so obviously we can ban others. All semiautomatics!”

Then…

You see these very arguments in every gun thread on this forum and every time a pol opens their mouths on it.

And we have a couple if in progress examples.

AZslim · 2018-05-17T01:52:02.838Z

But somehow the government will know when to stop when it comes to torture.

Smyrna · 2018-05-17T02:00:58.841Z

I share your distrust and it should have to go through a process for approval that includes a trusted entity, outside the military.

WildRose · 2018-05-17T03:18:42.057Z

Pelosi and Feinstein.

AZslim · 2018-05-17T05:17:17.427Z

Where did they say want to ban ALL guns?

AZslim · 2018-05-17T05:18:10.245Z

Who would be the trusted entity?

WildRose · 2018-05-17T05:18:28.544Z

AZslim:

Where did they say want to ban ALL guns?

WildRose · 2018-05-17T05:24:58.445Z

AZslim:

Where did they say want to ban ALL guns?

blob:https://www.dailymotion.com/cc2106c6-f66f-44af-9fb6-4c1a610a379e

WildRose · 2018-05-17T05:26:00.022Z

http://video.foxbusiness.com/9082a814-c610-4689-b553-f0708eab80cd

WildRose · 2018-05-17T05:26:27.250Z

WildRose:

AZslim:

Where did they say want to ban ALL guns?

https://www.dailymotion.com/cc2106c6-f66f-44af-9fb6-4c1a610a379e

Smyrna · 2018-05-17T10:36:29.279Z

IDK. It would have to be some sort of a judge, knowledgeable in the area but separate from the military hierarchy.

WuWei · 2018-05-17T11:55:24.852Z

It did. The military didn’t do this.

Smyrna · 2018-05-17T12:03:27.966Z

That could be? I wouldn’t know? What I am saying is that I’m not against enhanced interrogation techniques as long as, prior to them being done, a overseeing 3rd party agrees that the evidence demonstrates it’s necessary.

WuWei · 2018-05-17T12:05:14.485Z

There is only one party. Centgov.