Well put.
Looks like DeSantis is getting involved.
He has an investigation going into some of this drag queens “entertaining” children crap.
Good for him!
4 Likes
johnwk2
1311
From what I have read, parents of adolescent children may have brought their child/children to the event. But had the children not been let in and the law followed, they would not have been exposed to the lewd and sexual deviant behavior.
1 Like
They didn’t used to allow parents bring their children into R rated movies either.
How many times over more lewd are drag queen “shows” than a R rated movie??!!
Even worse when they try to expose other peoples children to it.
1 Like
When exactly were parents prohibited from bringing their own children to an R rated movie? What was the exact year?
That answers absolutely nothing. But thanks
johnwk2
1317

gooddad409:

johnwk2:
From what I have read, parents of adolescent children may have brought their child/children to the event. But had the children not been let in and the law followed, they would not have been exposed to the lewd and sexual deviant behavior.
They didn’t used to allow parents bring their children into R rated movies either.
How many times over more lewd are drag queen “shows” than a R rated movie??!!
Even worse when they try to expose other peoples children to it.
Absolutely spot on!
Of course, our current day provocateurs, in their perverted mission to defend exposing sexual deviant behavior to today’s innocent and impressionable adolescent children, pretend, and would have everyone believe, that age restrictions on sexual orientated movies were not actively observed a few generations ago.
But the question is, why are these current day provocateurs so intent on re-writing history and desirous of defending sexual abuse of today’s adolescent children?
JWK
1 Like
What about other groups? Yuppies? Christians? Capitalists? Which groups do you feel it’s ok to make fun of?
1 Like

johnwk2:

gooddad409:

johnwk2:
From what I have read, parents of adolescent children may have brought their child/children to the event. But had the children not been let in and the law followed, they would not have been exposed to the lewd and sexual deviant behavior.
They didn’t used to allow parents bring their children into R rated movies either.
How many times over more lewd are drag queen “shows” than a R rated movie??!!
Even worse when they try to expose other peoples children to it.
Absolutely spot on!
Of course, our current day provocateurs, in their perverted mission to defend exposing sexual deviant behavior to today’s innocent and impressionable adolescent children, pretend, and would have everyone believe, that age restrictions on sexual orientated movies were not actively observed a few generations ago.
But the question is, why are these current day provocateurs so intent on re-writing history and desirous of defending sexual abuse of today’s adolescent children?
JWK
They desire to groom/brainwash our kids and grandkids and will say anything to try and further that agenda apparently.
Certain movies were restricted according to the ratings for decades.
You and I know that. They do too!
I say drag queens should be arrested if they attempt to bring this lewd mess to schools.
Indecent exposure and contributing to the delinquency of minors come to mind.
We already took care of business locally. The last 2 lib school board members were swept out of office.
All conservatives now.
3 Likes
johnwk2
1321

gooddad409:

johnwk2:

gooddad409:

johnwk2:
From what I have read, parents of adolescent children may have brought their child/children to the event. But had the children not been let in and the law followed, they would not have been exposed to the lewd and sexual deviant behavior.
They didn’t used to allow parents bring their children into R rated movies either.
How many times over more lewd are drag queen “shows” than a R rated movie??!!
Even worse when they try to expose other peoples children to it.
Absolutely spot on!
Of course, our current day provocateurs, in their perverted mission to defend exposing sexual deviant behavior to today’s innocent and impressionable adolescent children, pretend, and would have everyone believe, that age restrictions on sexual orientated movies were not actively observed a few generations ago.
But the question is, why are these current day provocateurs so intent on re-writing history and desirous of defending sexual abuse of today’s adolescent children?
JWK
They desire to groom/brainwash our kids and grandkids and will say anything to try and further that agenda apparently.
Certain movies were restricted according to the ratings for decades.
You and I know that. They do too!
I say drag queens should be arrested if they attempt to bring this lewd mess to schools.
Indecent exposure and contributing to the delinquency of minors come to mind.
We already took care of business locally. The last 2 lib school board members were swept out of office.
All conservatives now.
They most certainly know it. So why do they pretend and lie about movie ratings and restricting minors from sexual deviant displays?
See:
II. Sex
The sanctity of the institution of marriage and the home shall be upheld. Pictures shall not infer that low forms of sex relationship are the accepted or common thing.
Adultery, sometimes necessary plot material, must not be explicitly treated, or justified, or presented attractively.
Scenes of Passion
They should not be introduced when not essential to the plot.
Excessive and lustful kissing, lustful embraces, suggestive postures and gestures, are not to be shown.
In general passion should so be treated that these scenes do not stimulate the lower and baser element.
Seduction or Rape
They should never be more than suggested, and only when essential for the plot, and even then never shown by explicit method.
They are never the proper subject for comedy.
Sex perversion or any inference to it is forbidden.
1 Like
JayJay
1322
First time I’ve ever seen anyone praising the Hays Code in quite some time…but I suppose I should not be surprised.
1 Like
johnwk2
1323
What is not surprising is your misrepresentation [praising the Hays Code] is providing documentation to confirm what was asserted in a post.
Certain movies were restricted according to the ratings for decades.
You and I know that. They do too!
But hey, that [misrepresentations, deflections, and outright lies] seems to be the strategy of our sexual deviant crowd.

1 Like
JayJay
1324
FreeandClear didn’t deny the the existence of the Hays code, nor did he deny the MPAA ratings system.
What he asked was “who ever prevented parents from taking their kids to an R rated movie, and which movie theater was ever punished for not doing so?”
Which is essentially what you are asking to be done to establishments that host adult-themed drag shows, which, if they were movies, would likely garner an R rating. If you think they would garner an NC17 (or old style X) rating, then you obviously have zero idea what is taking place at such drag shows. As adult themed as they are, these drag shows show far less than many R-rated movies show.
And since R means “minors must be accompanied by an adult”? That means while we might disagree with and look down on parents who take their kids to drag shows (or R-rated movie), legally there’s very little that can be done about it.
In this light, it’s nearly impossible to see your cite of the Hays Code as anything other than your desire to have it reinstated. The whole cite of the code had a definite “in the good old days, they didn’t let you make impure movies” vibe to it.
2 Likes
johnwk2
1325

You misrepresented my post as praising the Hays Code. But as I correctly pointed out:
But hey, that [misrepresentations, deflections, and outright lies] seems to be the strategy of our sexual deviant crowd.
JayJay
1326

johnwk2:

You misrepresented my post as praising the Hays Code. But as I correctly pointed out:
But hey, that [misrepresentations, deflections, and outright lies] seems to be the strategy of our sexual deviant crowd.
That’s the thing…I don’t think I misrepresented anything at all.
I KNOW you misrepresented or misunderstood what Free and Clear was saying.
Actively observed wasn’t what you said.
There was no outright prohibition that prevented parents from taking children to r rated movies. You made it up. All on some attempt to refer to yesteryear. But as with all reminiscing it’s clouded by fantasy.
JayJay
1328

FreeAndClear:
Actively observed wasn’t what you said.
There was no outright prohibition that prevented parents from taking children to r rated movies. You made it up. All on some attempt to refer to yesteryear. But as with all reminiscing it’s clouded by fantasy.
Right…the MPAA ratings system didn’t…and still doesn’t…have the force of law behind it. No parent can face jail time or fines for taking their kids to an R-rated movie, nor can theaters be legally sanctioned for allowing these kids in.
And let me tell you, there were a lot of R-rated movies whose advertising was geared towards minors as opposed to adults. Not so much nowadays, but back when I was growing up? Absolutely those films were advertised to reach minor children.
1 Like
johnwk2
1329

You most certainly misrepresented my post as praising the Hays Code when all I did was post it as evidence that “Certain movies were restricted according to the ratings for decades” which is what gooddad409 ASSERTED
johnwk2
1330

So now you resort to an exaggeration of what I posted and then argue against your own exaggeration.
You are the one making crap up.